Analysis · Members' statement · beta

Michael Kram

159 words · 10 sentences · 11 clauses

Statement grade
B+
Average 84 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Positioning 21%Claims 42%Reasoning 8%The question 11%The ask 19%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Positioning · 20 wordstoday the Liberals want people to believe that they are in favour of pipelines, but it is all an illusion.PositioningUnearned certainty Claims · 29 wordsNot so long ago, they declared that there was no business case for LNG development.1 The Liberal Prime Minister still has not gotten rid of the Liberals’ antidevelopment laws.2 Positioning · 13 wordsIn my home province of Saskatchewan, natural resource development is not an abstract.Positioning Claims · 20 wordsIt makes up 10% to 15% of the provincial government’s budget.3 It pays for hospitals, schools, roads and social services. Reasoning · 12 wordsAs a landlocked province, Saskatchewan cannot prosper from these resources without pipelines. Claims · 17 wordsFor over a decade, the Liberal government has been all talk and no action on resource development. The question · 17 wordsIn the face of global trade threats, when will the Liberal government get serious about resource development? The ask · 31 wordsInstead of more recycled speeches and photo ops, we need to get shovels in the ground quickly for oil and gas infrastructure, to build strength at home and unbreakable leverage abroad.

Analysed on