Analysis · Question Period answer · beta

Yasir Naqvi

Liberal on Finance 2026-04-24

107 words · 4 sentences · 6 clauses

Replying to Branden Leslie (Conservative)

“Mr. Speaker, it takes a special kind of spending problem to make Justin Trudeau look fiscally responsible, yet the Prime Minister has done it. His budget 2025 added $90 billion in net new spending, and the government is now paying over $55 billion this year just to service our debt. Canadians are being told to tighten their belt, yet the Prime Minister cannot even find his. Next week’s fiscal update is the moment of truth. Will the Prime Minister finally get serious, rein in his out-of-control spending and stop pouring inflationary gasoline on families and seniors who are struggling to survive?”

Statement grade

30 / 100, held down by Signal

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Positioning 73%Procedure 27%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Positioning · 78 wordsthese are very serious times in our country, in fact globally. Canadians understand that we are living through a precarious time and that we have to work extremely hard to ensure that we build our economy and invest in Canadians so they are supported through these difficult times.Vague promise Canadians deserve serious leadership, and that is precisely what the Prime Minister and the government are doing: Off pointWe are investing in Canadians as a bridge to a better future tomorrow.PositioningVague promise Procedure · 29 wordsThat is the work we are doing, whether it is the work we are doing in diversifying our economy here in Canada and opening new countries as places to—ProcedureOff point

At a glance

Lost points for
Little substanceMuch of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.
VagueMuch of this statement used imprecise wording, lacked details on timing or responsibility, or made broad claims without support.

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 0

6 of 11 deductions are Signal

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it.What the tags mean “these are very serious times in our country, in fact globally.”Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it.What the tags mean “Canadians understand that we are living through a precarious time and that we have to work extremely hard to ensure that we build our economy and invest in Canadians so they are supported through these difficult times.”Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it.What the tags mean “Canadians deserve serious leadership,”Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it.What the tags mean “and that is precisely what the Prime Minister and the government are doing:”Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it.What the tags mean “We are investing in Canadians as a bridge to a better future tomorrow.”Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business.What the tags mean “That is the work we are doing, whether it is the work we are doing in diversifying our economy here in Canada and opening new countries as places to—”Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.

Relevance · 73

3 of 11 deductions are Relevance

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the question asked.

Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “Canadians deserve serious leadership,”A partisan jab implying the opposition is not serious, offered in place of an answer on spending.
Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “and that is precisely what the Prime Minister and the government are doing:”A self-commendation of the government rather than any answer on spending in the fiscal update.
Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “That is the work we are doing, whether it is the work we are doing in diversifying our economy here in Canada and opening new countries as places to—”An unfinished aside about economic diversification that does not address the spending question.

Respect · no score

Not checked: graded before this measurement existed. Excluded from the average.

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Clarity · 33

2 of 11 deductions are Clarity

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

A promise with no date, no measure and no one responsible.What the tags mean “we have to work extremely hard to ensure that we build our economy and invest in Canadians”No actor, date, measure, or success condition is attached to this commitment.
A promise with no date, no measure and no one responsible.What the tags mean “a bridge to a better future tomorrow”The commitment names no actor, date, or measurable outcome.

Claims · 0

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

No checkable claims.

Analysed on 2026-09-15