Analysis · Question Period answer · beta

Maninder Sidhu

Liberal on International Trade 2026-04-24

44 words · 4 sentences · 4 clauses

Replying to David McKenzie (Conservative)

“Mr. Speaker, Canada’s ambassador to the U.S. says Canada is ready, willing and able to start the CUSMA review. The USTR says the U.S. is ready to talk, so what is the delay? This reminds me of a grade seven school dance. Everyone wants to dance, but no one will be the first to ask. There are 2.6 million Canadian jobs that rely on trade with the U.S., and tariffs are costing Canadians billions. When will the Prime Minister pick up the phone and get moving on the U.S. trade deal that he promised Canadians?”

Statement grade

C+

Average 65 / 100

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Claims 59%Promise 41%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Claims · 26 wordsCanada-U.S. trade relations are vitally important. They support millions of jobs on both sides of the border.¹ They support our workers, our industries and our businesses.Off point Promise · 18 wordsWith our new advisory council, we will continue to take a team Canada approach to the CUSMA review.²Vague promise

At a glance

Lost points for

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 100

0 of 4 deductions are Signal

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Nothing lost points.

Relevance · 39

3 of 4 deductions are Relevance

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the question asked.

Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “Canada-U.S. trade relations are vitally important.”A general statement of importance that answers nothing about the delay or timing.
Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “They support millions of jobs on both sides of the border.”A jobs statistic on both sides of the border, not a response to when talks will start.
Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “They support our workers, our industries and our businesses.”Generic praise of workers and businesses that does not answer the question asked.

Respect · no score

Not checked: graded before this measurement existed. Excluded from the average.

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Clarity · 56

1 of 4 deductions are Clarity

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

A promise with no date, no measure and no one responsible.What the tags mean “we will continue to take a team Canada approach”No date, measure or success condition is attached to this commitment.

Claims · 2

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1“They support millions of jobs on both sides of the border”Canada-U.S. trade relations support millions of jobs on both sides of the border.search
2“our new advisory council”The government has created a new advisory council related to the CUSMA review.search

Analysed on 2026-09-15