Analysis · Debate reply · beta

Anju Dhillon

Liberal on Jury Duty Appreciation Week Act 2026-04-24

80 words · 6 sentences · 8 clauses

Replying to Mario Beaulieu (Bloc Québécois)

“Mr. Speaker, the Bloc Québécois supports this bill, but only insofar as it is a gesture of recognition that does not involve any programs, administrative structures or spending, because the administration of justice is the exclusive jurisdiction of Quebec and the provinces. Does my colleague agree with that?”

Statement grade

A–

Average 88 / 100

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Positioning 14%Claims 16%Reasoning 70%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Positioning · 11 wordsmy colleague is right. I could not agree with him more.Positioning Claims · 13 wordsThe administration of justice falls under the jurisdiction of the provinces and Quebec.¹ Reasoning · 56 wordsIt is important for us today to also symbolically show what people are doing to advance the justice system. It is important for us to recognize those two things. It will allow us to better support people serving on a jury, Vague promiseso that they can continue to contribute to the administration of justice, while respecting jurisdictions.

At a glance

Lost points for
AnsweredOf this reply, 100% addressed the question or point raised.

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 83

2 of 3 deductions are Signal

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it.What the tags mean “my colleague is right.”Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it.What the tags mean “I could not agree with him more.”Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.

Relevance · 100

0 of 3 deductions are Relevance

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the point put to the member, and the bill under debate.

Nothing lost points.

Respect · no score

Not checked: graded before this measurement existed. Excluded from the average.

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Clarity · 82

1 of 3 deductions are Clarity

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

A promise with no date, no measure and no one responsible.What the tags mean “It will allow us to better support people serving on a jury”Asserts improved support with no actor, date, measure or success condition.

Claims · 1

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1“The administration of justice falls under the jurisdiction of the provinces and Quebec.”The administration of justice in Canada falls under provincial jurisdiction, including Quebec’s.search

Analysed on 2026-09-16