← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Relevance and Clarity. Average 87 / 100
Signal
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
61 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Respect
–
Not scored Viewing ↓
Clarity
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 69% Reasoning 31%
Structure · 3 steps
Claims · 0
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Claims · 50 words as a new member here, I came to realize very quickly that committees are the workhorse for Parliament. Off point I fear that the government is using majority to shut down debate on controversial legislation, something where Canadians might lose their voice. As well, committees are a place for transparency and accountability. Off point Reasoning · 22 words I am just wondering if speed is now more important than scrutiny when writing the law for this country and for Canadians.
At a glance
Lost points for Off point ×2
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 100
0 of 2 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Nothing lost points.
Relevance · 61
2 of 2 deductions are Relevance
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the motion under debate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “as a new member here, I came to realize very quickly that committees are the workhorse for Parliament.” This is a general remark about committees’ role in Parliament, not about the motion to continue debate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “As well, committees are a place for transparency and accountability.” This is a comment on committees as a venue for transparency, not on the motion’s purpose or effects.
Respect · no score
Not checked: graded before this measurement existed. Excluded from the average.
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Clarity · 100
0 of 2 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Nothing lost points.
Claims · 0
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
No checkable claims.
