Analysis · Debate reply · beta

Kody Blois

97 words · 7 sentences · 7 clauses

Replying to Kevin Lamoureux (Liberal)
“Mr. Speaker, the member would know that, since the last federal election, we have had a Prime Minister and a government that have talked a great deal about the issue of collaboration and working to elevate good ideas into good public policy, and today is a good example of that. Today, yes, we got an official majority. Three members were sworn in. We got to 174 members, but the first action taken today was actually the passage of a Conservative private member’s bill. It is good legislation. It fit into the crime agenda that this Prime Minister and this government have been talking about. Does he not see that collaboration can, in fact, be effective even in majorities?”
Statement grade
C–
55 / 100, held down by Signal
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 3%Anecdote 33%Promise 24%Positioning 40%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Claims · 3 wordsof course, yes. Anecdote · 32 wordsThis being the first time I have sat as a member of Parliament where we are actually in a majority situation, I have seen the good work that has happened over minorities.1Anecdote Promise · 9 wordsI know that will continue in a majority context. Positioning · 39 wordsAt the end of the day, regardless of the party’s standing in the House of Commons, we are here to serve Canadians. There are great ideas on all sides of this House. I have great relationships on all sides.Positioning Promise · 14 wordsI know we will continue to work collaboratively where it makes sense for Canadians.Vague promise

Analysed on