Analysis · Debate reply · beta

Stephanie Kusie

85 words · 4 sentences · 5 clauses

Replying to Ted Falk (Conservative)
“Mr. Speaker, the hon. member highlighted a lot of areas. We know that with the stolen seats that the Liberals recently acquired from opposition members, they now have 50.8% of the seats in this House. What they are trying to do with this motion is acquire 58.3% of the seats in committees. That is actually very unreasonable. They are looking to have seven out of 12 members be Liberal members. Why would they not be happy with six out of 11? If the Liberals are so bent on having control of the voting, why do they not give up the chairmanship of those committees? Then they could have control of the votes. Would that not make them happy, if they had maybe 54% of the representation instead of 58%?”
Statement grade
B
76 / 100, held down by Relevance
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Reasoning 41%Claims 59%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Reasoning · 35 wordsit is better not to give them more ideas as to the abuse of our democracy and the democratic process. The Liberals are capable of coming up with these types of ideas on their own. Claims · 50 wordsAgain, it is such a sad day for Canadians because they did not vote for this and they did not ask for this. They asked for an official opposition that has all of the powers and the benefits of being the official opposition, 1and that was stolen from us today.Partly on pointHidden agency

Analysed on