“Madam Speaker, Canadians are being told that this is about building a space industry for the future, and of course, we all want to see Canada succeed in that space. However, they are also looking at this and asking a very basic question: How does a government end up committing $200 million of taxpayer money to lease a launch pad that is not even operational? Is this what happens when we move away from a rules-based, accountable framework, like the one that was built under Stephen Harper, and toward a discretionary, cheque-writing approach that looks a lot more like a Liberal‑style “enriching close friends” type of government?”
Statement grade
C+
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity is 75. The grade is held to 69, 30 above Relevance.
69 / 100, held down by Relevance
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Aside 4%Positioning 18%Procedure 10%Claims 68%
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Madam Speaker, Aside · 5 wordsthat is an interesting one.AsidePositioning · 21 wordsI want to acknowledge the member’s, Partly on pointand perhaps that of other members of the opposition, devotion to following conspiracy theories online.PositioningOff pointProcedure · 6 wordsLet us talk about economic impact.ProcedureClaims · 37 wordsIn one of the great places in Canada, which is Nova Scotia, it could add 16,000 jobs and add $300 million to our GDP alone.1It is currently under construction and set to be completed in 2028.2Partly on pointProcedure · 5 wordsI will read a quote: ProcedureClaims · 40 words“We are proud that Nova Scotia is home to Canada’s first commercial spaceport and recognize the critical role Maritime Launch [Services] will play in offering a satellite launch facility to the global market.”3That was Premier Tim Houston in 2023.Partly on point