Analysis · Debate reply · beta

Xavier Barsalou-Duval

123 words · 8 sentences · 10 clauses

Replying to Kevin Lamoureux (Liberal)
“Madam Speaker, one of the aspects I want to highlight with regard to the legislation is the impact it would have on the industry as a whole after we see the legislation pass, go to committee and increase the amount of dialogue. There are industries, such as our aerospace industry. Quebec has a very healthy, growing and vibrant aerospace industry, and so does the province of Manitoba. I made reference to Magellan and the fine work it does. We are talking about good, quality jobs. By having legislation of this nature, we would be establishing a framework. My question for the member is, would he not agree that establishing a framework, so that we can do what we are doing with the legislation, will be good for our aerospace industry in particular?”
Statement grade
A
Average 90 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 53%Reasoning 47%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Madam Speaker, Claims · 65 wordsto answer my colleague’s question, yes, as we said, we welcome Bill C‑28. In Quebec, the aerospace industry accounts for more than 40,000 jobs—nearly 42,000 according to 2023 data.1 A lot of people work in this sector. I do not think Manitoba has 42,000 jobs in this sector.2 I am not saying there are no skilled people or people working on interesting things in Manitoba, Off pointReasoning · 58 wordsbut I do think Quebec has significant expertise that we have to retain. We have to leverage that, not spread our efforts thin.Partly on point That is why I am concerned about putting so much discretionary power in the minister’s hands. I want to make sure we have a fair system that rewards excellence, not whoever Ottawa chooses to reward.

Analysed on