Analysis · Debate reply · beta

Kevin Lamoureux

111 words · 6 sentences · 7 clauses

Replying to Claude DeBellefeuille (Bloc Québécois)
“Madam Speaker, it is always fascinating to listen to my colleague opposite talk about all of the bills tabled by the government in the House. I have to admit that he is a great public speaker. That said, what surprised me about his speech is that he talked about how hard-working the Bloc Québécois is and about how the Bloc takes its work seriously. Over the past six years, we have said that the Bloc Québécois is the adult in the room, and I think everyone agrees with that. That is not surprising because we did not change our way of doing things and we will not change it, even if the government does have a majority in the House and in committee. The Bloc Québécois wants to improve bills. Our guiding principle is that if a measure is good for Quebec, then we will support it, and all the better if it is good for the rest of Canada. We are rather proud of that because we are diligent and hard-working professionals. My question for my colleague is this: The bill says that some definitions will be established by regulation, but it make me rather uneasy to give the government the power to establish definitions by regulation. It gives the executive a lot of leeway to change the regulations as it sees fit, without parliamentary debate. Could my colleague explain why the public servants who drafted this bill are insisting that some rather important definitions in the bill be established by regulation?”
Statement grade
B–
Average 70 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 54%Reasoning 26%Procedure 13%Aside 7%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Madam Speaker, Claims · 17 wordsthe legislation establishes a very solid framework that would enable us to move forward on this file, Reasoning · 6 wordswhich I think is absolutely critical.Partly on point Procedure · 14 wordsI articulated in my speech why it is so critical that we move forward.Procedure Claims · 43 wordsNothing prevents further dialogue from taking place at committee stage. At such a point in time, any amendments would strengthen the legislation and address some of the concerns, I am sure that the government would be, at the very least, open to that.Unearned certainty Reasoning · 23 wordsUltimately, we just want to see the legislation get through the process because we have a very ambitious goal in terms of 2028.1Partly on point Aside · 8 wordsIt would be nice to see something launched.Aside

Analysed on