“Mr. Speaker, recognizing that now is the time, the government is focused on building Canada strong for all of us in different ways. When we think of securing our future and of the economic potential, the thousands of jobs and the contributions to the GDP, it is not just about the space industry but also involves our aerospace industries and post‑secondary facilities, with both direct and indirect jobs. We are talking about tens of thousands of lives. All of us get impacted by it. The legislation is a critical step in moving forward. I am wondering if the member could provide his thoughts on why it is important that, as a House, we deal with this issue at this time so we can create—”
Statement grade
B
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity is 86. The grade is held to 76, 30 above Signal.
76 / 100, held down by Signal
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 52%Positioning 23%Thanks 25%
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Claims · 17 wordswe agree.There is incredible economic opportunity in the space economy and in sectors related to it.Positioning · 6 wordsConservatives have always agreed with that.PositioningThanks · 30 wordsI know that my colleague from Okanagan Lake West—South Kelowna identified in his thoughts in the House, going back to Diefenbaker, Mulroney and Harper, how we have helped advance that.ThanksClaims · 44 wordsWhat we are saying and have said consistently in only the first two hours of debate on this piece of legislation is that there are the gaping holes in Bill C-28 that would rest all the power with the minister to make those decisions.12Positioning · 21 wordsThat causes grave concerns around Liberal insider access.It certainly is not a matter of transparency.Where are the rules, where—Positioning
