Analysis · Debate reply · beta

Tamara Kronis

97 words · 2 sentences · 3 clauses

Replying to Dan Albas (Conservative)
“Mr. Speaker, the government has said multiple times that this would align Canada with other G7 countries, like the U.K. and the United States. The legislation in the U.K., the Outer Space Act 1986, literally says that the licensing authority must be satisfied that an activity will not impede national security. In the United States, Congress decided that the giving of indemnification to participants in the space industry should be decided by Congress and not by the administration itself. Why would this legislation do neither?”
Statement grade
–
Not graded
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Anecdote 27%Claims 48%Reasoning 25%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Anecdote · 26 wordswhen I was a little girl, I thought these spaceships went to the moon and beyond through magic and that it was a wonderful, amazing illusion.Anecdote Claims · 47 wordsAs I look at this bill, I see yet another example of bills that are magic and illusion in the sense that they purport to put us on even ground with the G7 and to do wonderful and amazing things to propel Canada ahead in the world, Reasoning · 24 wordsbut there is an awful lot missing when we look under the covers, including the kind of regulation and detail my colleague just outlined.Partly on point

Analysed on