Analysis · Question Period answer · beta

Steven MacKinnon

96 words · 5 sentences · 9 clauses

Replying to Christine Normandin (Bloc Québécois)
“Mr. Speaker, there is a lot of buzz in Ottawa about building a new pipeline in western Canada, but no one in the private sector is interested because demand for oil is going to peak in 2029. It is not profitable. What is profitable is investing in the transition, funding clean technologies, and funding climate change adaptation, yet the Prime Minister of Canada tells us that, in the name of Canadian nationalism, we should add $10 billion in public funds to build a new pipeline, even though it is not profitable. If the private sector does not think it is profitable, then why would the government invest Quebeckers’ money in it?”
Statement grade
B–
74 / 100, held down by Relevance
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 85%Reasoning 15%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Claims · 82 wordsit is because Canada is investing in Quebec and we will also be undertaking major projects in the mining sector in Quebec.Vague promise There is Nouveau Monde Graphite, which represents thousands of jobs, the designation of the Port of Québec as a first port of arrival for our country, 12and the expansion of the Port of Montreal, 3which will increase capacity in Contrecœur by 60%.4 These are megaprojects that represent tens of thousands of jobs and economic opportunities for Quebeckers.5 We are investing. Reasoning · 14 wordsThat is what economic nationalism is all about, and that is good for Quebec.Partly on point

Analysed on