← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Respect and Clarity. Average 92 / 100
Signal
77 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
–
Not scored Viewing ↓
Respect
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Clarity
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Positioning 18% Claims 64% The question 19%
Structure · 4 steps
Claims · 5
Echo · said 13 times
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Positioning · 17 words no one thought it possible to outspend Justin Trudeau. This Liberal Prime Minister has somehow managed to. Positioning Claims · 61 words He has added $90 billion above the Trudeau-era levels in new spending and nearly doubled the deficit.1 2 Operating costs are up 9% in under a year.3 Two-thirds of that new spending goes to day-to-day operations, not investment.4 The result is the worst grocery inflation in the G7 and Canadians putting their own bills on credit cards are going to food banks.5 The question · 18 words When will this Liberal Prime Minister end his costly credit card budgeting so Canadians can afford to live?
At a glance
Lost points for Positioning ×2 Echo ×13 “When will the Liberal Prime Minister end his costly budgeting so Canadians can afford to live?” Said 13 times by 12 members. Every time it was said →
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 77
2 of 2 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “no one thought it possible to outspend Justin Trudeau.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “This Liberal Prime Minister has somehow managed to.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Relevance · no score
Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.
Respect · 100
0 of 2 deductions are Respect
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Nothing lost points.
Clarity · 100
0 of 2 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Nothing lost points.
Echo · 1 repeated line
Words members of Parliament keep repeating, found by the same rule for every member. No score depends on it.
“When will the Liberal Prime Minister end his costly budgeting so Canadians can afford to live?” Said 13 times by 12 members. Every time it was said →
Claims · 5
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “added $90 billion above the Trudeau-era levels in new spending” The current Liberal Prime Minister has added $90 billion in new spending above Trudeau-era levels. search 2 “nearly doubled the deficit” The federal deficit has nearly doubled under the current Prime Minister compared with the Trudeau era. search 3 “Operating costs are up 9% in under a year” Canadian federal government operating costs are up 9% in under a year. search 4 “Two-thirds of that new spending goes to day-to-day operations” Two-thirds of the new government spending goes to day-to-day operations rather than investment. search 5 “the worst grocery inflation in the G7” Canada has the worst grocery inflation in the G7. search
