Analysis · Question Period question · beta

John Brassard

Conservative on Ethics 2026-04-28

102 words · 4 sentences · 4 clauses

Statement grade

A+

Average 100 / 100

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Claims 66%The question 34%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Claims · 67 wordsthe ethics committee also recommended that the general application provisions of the Conflict of Interest Act need to change.¹ That means that a public office holder, including a highly conflicted prime minister, can be involved in decisions they benefit from personally, even though they are in conflict. Brookfield’s COO again confirmed that the Prime Minister will make millions from public policy decisions that align with Brookfield’s strategies.² The question · 35 wordsWill this Liberal Prime Minister commit today to address this loophole in the law so Canadians have confidence that he is making decisions in the best interests of the country, not his own or Brookfield’s?

At a glance

Nothing lost points.

Choose a measurement above to see how it scored.

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 100

Nothing lost points on Signal.

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Relevance · no score

Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.

Respect · 100

Nothing lost points on Respect.

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Clarity · 100

Nothing lost points on Clarity.

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

Claims · 2

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1“the ethics committee also recommended that the general application provisions of the Conflict of Interest Act need to change”The ethics committee recommended that the general application provisions of the Conflict of Interest Act need to change.search
2“Brookfield’s COO again confirmed that the Prime Minister will make millions from public policy decisions that align with Brookfield’s strategies”Brookfield’s COO said the Prime Minister will make millions from public policy decisions that align with Brookfield’s strategies.search

Analysed on 2026-10-20