← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity is 68. The grade is held to 53, 30 above Clarity. 53 / 100, held down by Clarity
Signal
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
48 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Respect
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Clarity
23 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Reasoning 9% Claims 91%
Structure · 3 steps
Claims · 0
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Reasoning · 4 words ambition is very important. Claims · 43 words I think all Canadians have the ambition for space exploration and also for the commercialization of space. Unearned certainty As I said earlier, all Canadians also want accountability and transparency about where their tax dollars are being spent, Unearned certainty and that is needed in Bill C-28. Partly on point
At a glance
Lost points for Partly on point ×4 Unearned certainty ×2 Didn't answer None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate. Vague Much of this statement used imprecise wording, lacked details on timing or responsibility, or made broad claims without support.
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 100
0 of 6 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Nothing lost points.
Relevance · 48
4 of 6 deductions are Relevance
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the point put to the member, and the bill under debate.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “ambition is very important.” Speaks to the value of ambition generally without saying whether the 2028 goal is shared.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “I think all Canadians have the ambition for space exploration and also for the commercialization of space.” About Canadians’ ambitions for space generally, not the 2028 launch date asked about.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “As I said earlier, all Canadians also want accountability and transparency about where their tax dollars are being spent,” Turns to accountability for tax dollars, not whether the 2028 goal is shared.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “and that is needed in Bill C-28.” About accountability needed in the bill, not the ambition for a 2028 launch.
Respect · 100
0 of 6 deductions are Respect
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Nothing lost points.
Clarity · 23
2 of 6 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Unearned certainty Something stated as certain with nothing to back it. What the tags mean → “all Canadians have the ambition” A universal claim about what all Canadians feel is asserted with no source.
Unearned certainty Something stated as certain with nothing to back it. What the tags mean → “all Canadians also want accountability” The same formula asserts a unanimous public demand without any backing.
Claims · 0
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
No checkable claims.
