Analysis · Debate reply · beta

Karim Bardeesy

89 words · 6 sentences · 7 clauses

Replying to Philip Lawrence (Conservative)
“Mr. Speaker, I just want to clarify something. The member earlier said that there are definitions in the bill for “launch”, “launch vehicle” and “re-entry vehicle”. The reality is that there is a transitional definition, and the minister can now call a “launch vehicle” anything. He could call it an orange if he wanted to. There is no real, permanent definition, in contrast to what he says. I would go forward to things that are absolutely not in there, which are the certification and operation of a launch re-entry vehicle, safety requirements and anything on national security. If the Liberals do not want to put it in the legislation, will they at least publish the draft regulations?”
Statement grade
B
Average 79 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Positioning 16%Claims 84%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Positioning · 14 wordsI think my colleague for Northumberland—Clarke is familiar with how legislation and regulations work.Mockery Claims · 75 wordsWe bring legislation forward, and then regulations are developed under that.1 I know there is a strong commitment to safety in this kind of work. The people and the professionals who are involved in this work take the safety pieces extremely seriously. It is part of a broader ecosystem of companies, in fact, that are working on this. The sovereign capabilities that we would be building through this act would take care of that situation.Partly on pointVague promise

Analysed on