Analysis · Debate reply · beta

Karim Bardeesy

128 words · 5 sentences · 7 clauses

Replying to Ned Kuruc (Conservative)
“Mr. Speaker, I would like to touch a little on theory and reality. We heard my colleague across the way talk about launch capability and how it is going to create jobs and all this good stuff, but then we actually have reality. The reality is that Maritime Launch Services leased to Canada for $20 million a year a concrete pad, which is being leased for $13,000 a year. Our Canadian taxpayers are on the hook for $20 million a year. It is a dirt road with a concrete pad. The other reality is that Telesat, which got over $2 billion from Canadian taxpayers, is now running from creditors. I would like to hear comments from the member on this huge mismanagement of Canadian taxpayer dollars.”
Statement grade
B
75 / 100, held down by Relevance
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Thanks 3%Reasoning 43%Procedure 5%Claims 48%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Thanks · 4 wordsI appreciate the question, ThanksReasoning · 21 wordsbut I would advise that the demand for this kind of capability is exactly why we are responding with this legislation.Partly on point Procedure · 7 wordsHere is what Kepler had to say: ProcedureClaims · 62 words“It is essential that Canada’s sovereign launch capability is globally competitive so it can meet domestic Department of National Defence requirements while also serving global launch demands.”1 Eutelsat also relied on American firms and facilities to launch 20 satellites.2 It said that it “always welcomes the prospect of new entrants into the launcher market to increase the options for access to space.”3 Reasoning · 34 wordsIt is the building up of supply that we are doing, in part through the legislation we are enabling here today, that enables the sovereign launch capability we have and also attracts new investment.Partly on point

Analysed on