Analysis · Question Period answer · beta

Mark Carney

Liberal on Finance 2026-04-29

89 words · 7 sentences · 8 clauses

Replying to Pierre Poilievre (Conservative)

“Mr. Speaker, this Liberal Prime Minister has been wrong about every major economic issue of the last decade. He was wrong to push for bigger and broader carbon taxes, wrong to say that we should leave 50% of our oil in the ground, wrong to oppose the northern gateway pipeline, wrong to say COVID would lead to deflation, wrong to say money printing would not raise the cost and wrong to say that affordability is the best that it has been in a decade. He keeps getting it wrong. Yesterday, he repeated the same mistakes. When will he realize that the more he gets it wrong, the more the Canadian people have to pay?”

Statement grade

37 / 100, held down by Relevance

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Claims 67%Positioning 33%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Claims · 13 wordshe was wrong on crypto, wrong on Brexit and I could go on.Partly on point Positioning · 15 wordsHowever, does he know what this government is right on? It is about co-operative federalism.Positioning Claims · 18 wordsWe are working with the great Province of Alberta to make sure that Canadian energy powers the world.Vague promise Positioning · 6 wordsIt is about ensuring our competitiveness.Positioning Claims · 29 wordsIt is about working with the Province of Ontario, and a premier who picks up my phone calls and works with us to put Darlington new nuclear into power.¹ Positioning · 8 wordsIt is about building Canada strong for all.PositioningOff point

At a glance

Lost points for
Didn't answerNone of this answer addressed the specific question that was asked.

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 61

4 of 13 deductions are Signal

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it.What the tags mean “However, does he know what this government is right on?”Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it.What the tags mean “It is about co-operative federalism.”Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it.What the tags mean “It is about ensuring our competitiveness.”Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it.What the tags mean “It is about building Canada strong for all.”Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.

Relevance · 7

8 of 13 deductions are Relevance

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the question asked.

Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about.What the tags mean “he was wrong on crypto, wrong on Brexit and I could go on.”It extends the list of alleged economic errors but does not answer when the Prime Minister will change course.
Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “However, does he know what this government is right on?”It pivots to the government’s own record instead of answering the question asked.
Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “It is about co-operative federalism.”It praises the government’s approach to federalism, not the question about the Prime Minister’s economic mistakes.
Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “We are working with the great Province of Alberta to make sure that Canadian energy powers the world.”It is praise of the government’s work with Alberta on energy, not an answer to the question asked.
Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “It is about ensuring our competitiveness.”It promotes the government’s competitiveness agenda instead of addressing the question.
Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “It is about working with the Province of Ontario,”It is about cooperation with Ontario, not the economic record the question raises.
Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “and a premier who picks up my phone calls and works with us to put Darlington new nuclear into power.”It cites the Darlington nuclear project as praise of the government, not an answer to the question.
Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “It is about building Canada strong for all.”It is a general statement of the government’s aims, not a reply to the question asked.

Respect · 100

0 of 13 deductions are Respect

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Nothing lost points.

Clarity · 74

1 of 13 deductions are Clarity

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

A promise with no date, no measure and no one responsible.What the tags mean “We are working with the great Province of Alberta”The speaker claims ongoing collaboration but names no measure, date, or success condition for it.

Claims · 1

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1“put Darlington new nuclear into power”The federal government is working with Ontario to bring the Darlington new nuclear project into power.search

Analysed on 2026-10-20