Analysis · Question Period question · beta

Gord Johns

NDP on Veterans Affairs 2026-04-29

83 words · 3 sentences · 5 clauses

Statement grade

A+

Average 100 / 100

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Claims 65%The question 35%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Claims · 54 wordsthe Liberal government’s decision to end the Canadian Corps of Commissionaires’ preferential contracting threatens jobs for veterans who rely on it for stable work after service, ¹while potentially shifting contracts to for-profit firms. For decades, Commissionaires has supported their transition from serving our nation in the Canadian Armed Forces or the RCMP with dignity. The question · 29 wordsWhy is the Minister of Veterans Affairs moving ahead without any consultation with the commissionaires, ²and will she instead reverse these arbitrary procurement changes before veterans pay the price?

At a glance

Nothing lost points.

Choose a measurement above to see how it scored.

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 100

Nothing lost points on Signal.

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Relevance · no score

Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.

Respect · 100

Nothing lost points on Respect.

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Clarity · 100

Nothing lost points on Clarity.

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

Claims · 2

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1“decision to end the Canadian Corps of Commissionaires’ preferential contracting”The Liberal government has decided to end the Canadian Corps of Commissionaires’ preferential contracting in federal procurement.search
2“without any consultation with the commissionaires”The Minister of Veterans Affairs is proceeding with the procurement changes without any consultation with the Commissionaires.search

Analysed on 2026-10-20