This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Claims · 114 wordssometimes when we debate bills such as this, we are debating a problem that could exist in the future or that may exist. In this case, that is not at all what we are talking about. We are talking about something that is not a hypothetical problem. We are talking about something that has happened and is happening to veterans in this country. This is something that was raised quite publicly a few years ago. It was shocking and appalling, frankly, to have heard the Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Veterans Affairs stand in this House just a few minutes ago and say that this is a solution in search of a problem.1 Positioning · 21 wordsHe knows full well, and the government over there knows full well, that this has happened to veterans in this country.Positioning Claims · 130 wordsThe men and women who bravely served this country are looking for help in order to live their lives. Instead, they have been asked if they have considered medical assistance in dying. I have heard from countless veterans who have told me that they, or others they know, have been offered this kind of thing. When this veterans scandal broke a few years ago, the Liberals’ response at the time, to something that I would say is a very massive scandal, frankly, was to say that they investigated themselves and it was just one public servant, whom they then fired.2 We heard the Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Veterans Affairs, not too long ago, say that they put in place measures to ensure that this would never happen again, 3Positioning · 15 wordsand that is it. They just washed their hands. That is great; all is wonderful.Positioning Claims · 122 wordsHowever, the problem with this is that it contradicts the testimony and the claims of several other veterans who, both before and since, have claimed that they were also offered medical assistance in dying by different public servants. This includes being offered MAID by bureaucrats who were male, despite the government claiming it was only one female employee who had gone rogue, apparently. Despite the government claiming that this issue has been put to rest, we put forward an Order Paper question, which returned a few months ago and revealed that there were behind-the-scenes lawsuits by families whose loved ones were, in fact, offered MAID by the Government of Canada, 4and that there was even a settlement paid and non-disclosure agreements signed.5 Positioning · 18 wordsDo lawsuits, settlements and non-disclosure agreements sound like this issue has been put to rest? I think not.Positioning Procedure · 7 wordsWe can establish the following three things.Procedure Positioning · 27 wordsFirst, Canadians, certainly veterans, do not trust the Liberal government. Second, the Liberals have been far less than honest about the scope and prevalence of this issue.Positioning Claims · 35 wordsThird, they already had bureaucrats who were pushing medical assistance in dying on veterans who did not wish to have it, and veterans are continuing to raise the alarm that this issue is still occurring. Reasoning · 28 wordsAt the very least, we can dismiss the Liberal talking points that this issue has been put to rest and that there is no need for this legislation. Claims · 36 wordsOn the one hand, Canadians have the Liberals’ claims that this has stopped, despite the evidence to the contrary. On the other hand, we have dozens of veterans who are coming forward and pleading for help. Reasoning · 89 wordsI will just engage for a moment in hypotheticals. Let us suppose the Liberals were telling the truth, that this issue was simply a rogue public servant and that they are entirely opposed to offering MAID to Canada’s veterans. If this were the case, then they should be happily supporting this legislation, as it would codify what they claim to believe, which is that public servants should not be pushing euthanasia on veterans who do not wish to have it, especially those who are vulnerable and looking for help. Claims · 381 wordsIn every case that I have heard about, that is exactly the situation that we are talking about here. The Liberals like to claim, and we heard it even here today in the House, that this issue is just being manufactured, that veterans are making this up and that opposition MPs are making this up. They cite the fact that no veteran has approached them to reveal that these cases are happening.13 What they are failing to consider is that the dozens of veterans who have reached out to me and others concerning this issue are completely terrified of the retribution they will face if they come out publicly. This is not something they are imagining in their minds, because it has happened. When these veterans are implored to come forward, they can easily look to the case of Christine Gauthier, a veteran and a Canadian Paralympian who bravely went public about being offered medical assistance in dying in 2022 when she was simply asking for help to get wheelchair access to her home.612 As a result of not having this, she would literally have to drag herself across a gravel driveway, because she is in a wheelchair, and up a couple of flights of stairs to get into her home. Instead of offering her the wheelchair access that she was looking for, the government said to her, “How about we offer you medical assistance in dying instead?” After that story went across this country, and after Christine came to the Standing Committee on Veterans Affairs to tell her story, she was targeted by the government, 7which made her life a living hell. In the end it was other veterans groups, despite promises that were made by the Liberal government, that had to raise funds to build her a wheelchair access, 8because Veterans Affairs was refusing to process any of her claims.9 Christine showed up at committee with a suitcase full of paperwork that Veterans Affairs had forced upon her as an excuse not to provide her with the help she needed. It offered her medical assistance in dying instead when she was not seeking it. She claimed that the burden VAC was putting on her and the difficulties it brought upon her were worse than any injury she had sustained. Positioning · 59 wordsHow can the Liberals smugly sit there and say that they will not act unless veterans come forward, when the last veteran who did come forward was subjected to years of administrative abuse and sanctuary trauma by the very department she called out? It is clear that the Liberals cannot be trusted to have veterans’ best interests in mind.PositioningUnearned certainty Procedure · 20 wordsI would like to touch on veterans issues just a little more, because it is not just about this issue.Procedure Claims · 36 wordsIn the time the Liberals have been in power, there have been nine different ministers of Veterans Affairs, 10and some of those ministers served in the role for only a few months before being shuffled on, Positioning · 31 wordswhich makes things clear to veterans. They see how unseriously the role of minister of Veterans Affairs is being treated and how it is treated as a secondary role for Liberals.Positioning Claims · 65 wordsAll nine of those ministers claimed they would eliminate backlogs and would make sure veterans are helped, and that this would be their top priority, but in all cases those backlogs continued to increase. In fact 90% of the claims that are denied by Veterans Affairs are then later approved, decided in the veteran’s favour, when they go to the Veterans Review and Appeal Board, 11Reasoning · 15 wordswhich tells us that there is something clearly wrong with what is going on there. Positioning · 12 wordsIt is like an effort to deny veterans the help they deserve.Positioning Claims · 22 wordsThere is clearly a systemic issue, and ultimately it takes many years for most veterans to go through the whole appeals process. Positioning · 19 wordsI think there is an attempt to frighten veterans off so the government does not have to pay them.Positioning Claims · 19 wordsVeterans often talk about a triple-D policy: delay, deny, die. Their claims are delayed, then their claims are denied, Positioning · 21 wordsand what is really happening is that the government is hoping they will just go away and give up the fight.PositioningOff point Claims · 14 wordsNow, to make matters worse, officials are even offering to help with their death. Reasoning · 37 wordsNo matter what one thinks about medical assistance in dying as a policy, I think we should all be able to agree that it should not be offered or pushed on those who do not want it, Claims · 36 wordsand that is what the bill would ensure. The bill seeks to make sure that people who do not wish to have medical assistance in dying do not have it pushed on them by government bureaucrats. Reasoning · 30 wordsVeterans should not have these kinds of things done to them when they are seeking help to live their lives. They should not instead be offered medical assistance in dying. Claims · 13 wordsThat is what the bill would do. It is all it would do. The ask · 7 wordsI hope all members will support it, Reasoning · 11 wordsbecause it is right for veterans and right for all Canadians.
Analysed on