“Mr. Speaker, my friend the member for Courtenay—Alberni has long been a strong advocate for better health outcomes in his community and across Canada, and I am honoured and fortunate to work with him in the House for the betterment of Canadian health outcomes. Those outcomes are possible thanks to our investments in health care, just as yesterday’s spring economic statement was our government’s next step in our plan to build a stronger, more independent and resilient Canada. We know that we are only stronger and more resilient if we have healthy Canadians, which is something I think everybody here agrees on. That is why our government came to office with the pledge to protect existing pharmacare agreements. We know the role that they play in keeping Canadians healthy. In fact, starting last month, my colleague’s constituents in British Columbia are seeing the effects of their province’s pharmacare agreements first-hand, since it came into effect on March 1. Thanks to this agreement, more Canadians have free and low-cost access to a range of contraceptives; Canadians living with diabetes can get essential, life-saving drugs for their condition; and Canadians are keeping more money in their pockets while improving their health outcomes. I know the member opposite would like us to go full speed ahead, but recent years have taught us that we need to be mindful of the broader context, both within Canada and beyond our borders, as we make decisions and as we consider the changing fiscal environment, how policy decisions in other countries impact our pharmaceutical supply and what we hear from our provincial and territorial partners. All of these things matter. For our part, our government will continue to control what we can. That means working closely with our health partners, including provinces, territories and indigenous people, to see how we can help them deliver health care for all Canadians. As we have always said, we cannot build Canada strong without healthy Canadians.”
Statement grade
A
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity.
Average 90 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Greeting · 8 wordsI want to thank the member for coming.GreetingPromise · 20 wordsI know it is inconvenient, but I will continue to drag her and her government here to debate this issue, Positioning · 13 wordsbecause what we heard does not match the reality that Canadians are facing.PositioningUnearned certaintyClaims · 30 wordsIt is great to hear that British Columbians are getting access to pharmacare.The government says pharmacare is moving ahead, but only four out of five Canadians are accessing it.1Positioning · 7 wordsThat is not progress; that is exclusion.PositioningClaims · 60 wordsThe Liberals say it takes time, but provinces like Newfoundland and Labrador and Nova Scotia are ready now, 2and the federal government is refusing to negotiate.3We just heard the parliamentary secretary say it is too expensive, 4but pharmacare actually saves money for families and for provinces.The real cost is forcing Canadians to go without the medicine they need.Procedure · 4 wordsLet us be clear.ProcedureClaims · 12 wordsMentioning pharmacare once in a major economic update is not a plan.5Positioning · 19 wordsIt is a signal that the government is walking away from its promise, and it is not nation building.PositioningClaims · 19 wordsCanadians were told that this would be a national program, not a patchwork or something determined by postal code.Reasoning · 16 wordsNo one in this country should have to choose between paying rent and filling a prescription.The question · 17 wordsThe question remains.When will the government stop delaying, start negotiating and deliver pharmacare for all Canadians?