Analysis · Debate reply · beta

Pierre Poilievre

169 words · 13 sentences · 14 clauses

Replying to Sandra Cobena (Conservative)
“Mr. Speaker, we have seen the statistics. We in Canada now have had six consecutive quarters of more businesses shutting down than opening up. It is an entrepreneurial drought. Of course, these are the Canadians who have been grinding it out, opening early, closing late and making personal sacrifices. They cite regulatory uncertainty, delays in permitting and overtaxation. These are the Canadian dollars that are actually leaving the country. My question for the member is, does he think this fund will fix those issues?”
Statement grade
A–
Average 85 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Thanks 6%Claims 75%Procedure 9%Reasoning 11%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Thanks · 10 wordsthat is an excellent question. The member is quite right.Thanks Claims · 105 wordsFor six consecutive quarters, there have been more businesses that have closed than opened in Canada.1 A recent survey showed there are twice as many Canadian businesses that opened in 2024 outside of Canada than inside of Canada.2 For the elbows-up crowd in the room, Canadians are now opening more businesses in the United States than they are opening in Canada. In the last decade, $1 trillion of net investment has flowed out of our country.3 A majority of Canadian pension funds are, according to Statistics Canada, invested abroad and not here at home, a problem that has worsened since the Prime Minister took office.4Partly on point Procedure · 15 wordsNow, the question was very particular: Would the million small businesses across this country benefit?Procedure Reasoning · 3 wordsOf course not. Claims · 21 wordsThey will not be invited to the investment summit. It will just be for large multinational corporations that have political power. Reasoning · 15 wordsSmall businesses that serve customers will lose. Multinationals that serve politicians in power will win.

Analysed on