← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity is 81. The grade is held to 76, 30 above Relevance. 76 / 100, held down by Relevance
Signal
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
46 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Respect
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Clarity
79 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 100%
Structure · 2 steps
Claims · 4
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Claims · 87 words what is great about this fund is that we are leveraging our strong fiscal position in Canada. Again, the IMF said Canada has the strongest fiscal position in the G7.1 We just reported $11 billion less in the deficit.3 We have cut operating spending and increases.2 We are moving down from 8%, on average, to 2%.4 We are doing that, all while supporting Canadians with affordability measures and building a stronger economy. We want to ensure that Canadians can benefit from the generational wealth we are building. Partly on point Vague promise
At a glance
Lost points for Partly on point ×7 Vague promise Didn't answer None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 100
0 of 8 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Nothing lost points.
Relevance · 46
7 of 8 deductions are Relevance
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the point put to the member, and the motion under debate.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “what is great about this fund is that we are leveraging our strong fiscal position in Canada.” About the fund’s fiscal footing, not who will lead it as asked.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “Again, the IMF said Canada has the strongest fiscal position in the G7.” Cites the IMF on Canada’s fiscal standing, not the CEO question.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “We just reported $11 billion less in the deficit.” Reports a smaller deficit, not who will head the fund.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “We have cut operating spending and increases.” About operating spending cuts, not the CEO or fund governance.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “We are moving down from 8%, on average, to 2%.” About spending growth figures, not who will lead the fund.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “We are doing that, all while supporting Canadians with affordability measures and building a stronger economy.” About affordability measures and the economy, not the CEO question.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “We want to ensure that Canadians can benefit from the generational wealth we are building.” About benefits for Canadians from the fund, not who will run it.
Respect · 100
0 of 8 deductions are Respect
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Nothing lost points.
Clarity · 79
1 of 8 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Vague promise A promise with no date, no measure and no one responsible. What the tags mean → “We want to ensure that Canadians can benefit from the generational wealth” The commitment names no actor, measure, date or success condition.
Claims · 4
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “Canada has the strongest fiscal position in the G7.” The IMF said that Canada has the strongest fiscal position in the G7. search 2 “We have cut operating spending and increases.” The government cut operating spending and increases. search 3 “$11 billion less in the deficit.” The government reported $11 billion less in the deficit. search 4 “We are moving down from 8%, on average, to 2%.” The government is moving down from 8%, on average, to 2%. search
