Analysis · Speech on a motion · beta

Kevin Lamoureux

1723 words · 78 sentences · 101 clauses

Statement grade
C+
65 / 100, held down by Relevance
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 60%Anecdote 1%Positioning 22%Reasoning 4%Procedure 4%The ask 2%Promise 6%Aside 1%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Claims · 25 wordsit is interesting that just a year ago, Canadians chose a new government, a new Prime Minister and a direction I thought was fairly clear.1 Anecdote · 13 wordsLike other members, I knocked on thousands of doors during the last election.Anecdote Claims · 46 wordsI have a fairly good sense of what the expectations of Canadians are. I have a fairly good understanding of why Canadians made the decision they made. About 8.5 million Canadians voted for the Prime Minister, the Liberal Party and the 300-plus candidates throughout the country.2 Positioning · 138 wordsCanadians got the change they needed to see at the government level. However, in listening to the last speaker, it seems there has been absolutely zero change in the Conservative Party’s approach to Canada. Its members consistently talk about it being broken, Off pointand what I really find somewhat distasteful are the allegations, which are constant, to try to make it look as though members of Parliament are corrupt. The character assassination that comes over from the Conservative ranks toward the government is fairly pathetic. It is definitely consistent.Partly on point What motivates the Prime Minister and every Liberal member of the Liberal caucus is what we hear from our constituents: the desire to make Canada a stronger and healthier country. It is not to get out of the way but to recognize that the government has a role to play.Positioning Claims · 203 wordsWe heard that when we listened to what people were saying one year ago, almost to the day, when people were at the polls. What they wanted was a government that was going to be there to protect and secure Canadian interests at a time of economic uncertainty, which was being put on in good part because of President Trump with the threat of tariffs and the issue of trade. That was the issue Canadians were coming to grips with a year ago, and they wanted to hear what politicians had to say. Canadians did a comparison between the leaders. The leader of the Conservative Party, for all intents and purposes, has been a career politician and nothing really beyond that. Canadians contrasted him with the current Prime Minister, the one they chose, who had actually been appointed to be the Governor of the Bank of Canada by a Conservative prime minister, Stephen Harper.3 He has also been the Governor of the Bank of England.4 Virtually throughout the G20 countries and beyond, the Prime Minister is recognized as a first-rate economist, someone who genuinely understands the economy. That is why he was so well received in Davos with the speech he delivered there. Positioning · 102 wordsOur Prime Minister understands what it takes to build an economy. From day one after the election, that is where the focus of the government has been, serving Canadians first and foremost. With respect to all the trash talk we hear from members of the Conservative Party towards the integrity of members, whether the Prime Minister or other ministers, I say shame on the Conservatives for trying to give false impressions and mislead Canadians, whether it is here on the floor of the House of Commons, through social media or through the millions of emails they send out. It does a disservice.Positioning Reasoning · 14 wordsThere is an expectation that the official opposition be a critic of the government, Anecdote · 8 wordsbut I was in opposition for many years, AnecdoteOff pointProcedure · 17 wordsand as I said before, there is a fine line. Actually, it is a very broad line, ProcedurePositioning · 20 wordsand the Conservatives have crossed that line. At least, the current leadership of the Conservative Party has crossed that line, PositioningClaims · 14 wordsbecause it is catering to the far right, the extreme far right, quite frankly. Reasoning · 27 wordsThat might feed some of the Conservative base, but it is time to start focusing on what Canadians are saying and on the interests of the country. The ask · 35 wordsIt is time that the far-right Conservative Party today and its House leadership team start paying more attention to the needs of Canadians than to the needs of the self-serving Conservative leadership team of today. Positioning · 32 wordsI say that in such a manner because of the personal shots that are constantly being raised, Off pointas if personal gain or giving political whatever to so-called friends were the motivating factor.PositioningPartly on point Claims · 22 wordsI can tell the House that the government has given grants to Conservatives, to New Democrats, to Liberals and to apolitical individuals. Positioning · 28 wordsThat is not a measuring stick when it comes to the progress of our great nation. It is all about building a stronger Canadian economy for all Canadians.Positioning Claims · 28 wordsTake a look at what actions we have taken to date that, collectively, are making a difference and that will provide hope for the future of Canada’s economy.Partly on point Positioning · 18 wordsEvery Liberal member of Parliament believes that Canada is the greatest country in the world to call home, PositioningPromise · 31 wordsand we are committed to building on the hopes, desires and needs of the nation today so Canada will continue to be the best country in the world to call home.Vague promise Positioning · 13 wordsThat does not mean we stand out of the way and do nothing.PositioningOff point Procedure · 22 wordsLook at what has actually been proposed by the Prime Minister, the Minister of Finance and, in fact, the entire Liberal caucus: ProcedureClaims · 157 wordsa sovereign wealth fund.5 There is an unholy alliance between the Bloc and the Conservatives. They are now in the opposition. They have united on this saying, “No, no, it is not good for Canada.” There are dozens of sovereign wealth funds around the world today, but the opposition does not believe Canada should have a sovereign wealth fund. Our fund, the Canada Strong fund, is a wonderful opportunity to offer investors abroad and at home. I also like to believe it is going to have an impact on people who do have some extra finances. They would like to be able to be part of a strategic fund dealing with our sovereignty, be able to demonstrate a sense of pride in our nation, be provided some guarantees, and invest in Canada. In terms of the administration, think in terms of the building office that we have, the Major Projects Office, 6which is located in the Prairies, Positioning · 5 wordsas well it should be.Positioning Claims · 96 wordsTake a look at a lot of the investments and the driving force, in many ways, over the next few years. We want major projects. We not only want them; we also want to see them turn into a reality. I would argue that we would have to go back generations and generations before we would find a Prime Minister who has been as committed to attracting the types of investments that are necessary and to doing the work that is necessary in order to build the type of support to build and to build big. Promise · 44 wordsBy doing that, we are going to provide the opportunities, the jobs, the incomes and the GDP growth into the future. Even if we do not realize all of that in the next year or two, let us get the ball moving on it. Claims · 44 wordsIt is a bit of a joke when I hear the leader of the Conservative Party inside the House or outside the House try to compare himself to the Prime Minister, saying that the Prime Minister has no understanding of how an economy works. Aside · 23 wordsThat is like saying that Wayne Gretzky does not know how to skate or that Céline Dion cannot sing. How silly that is.Aside Positioning · 26 wordsReally and truly, do the Conservatives believe that there is anyone who believes those sorts of assertions that come from the leader of the Conservative Party?PositioningOff point Claims · 81 wordsIf I go back to a week or so after the last federal election, I remember Bill C-5, the One Canadian Economy Act, 7and the actions that the federal government took, literally weeks after coming back in session, to take down barriers so at least from a national perspective we would have one Canadian economy. There have been efforts back then and today through which we are continuing to encourage other premiers to start taking down some of the provincial barriers. Reasoning · 28 wordsWhether it is with respect to consumer products or labour mobility, we need to continue to push, encourage and support a team Canada approach at building Canada strong. Claims · 62 wordsThe need is there, and it was demonstrated throughout the election, when people were telling me and everyone else at the door about their concern about the dependency Canada has on the United States as a direct result of threats of tariffs on our products. We responded in many different ways. Bill C-5 is just one of those ways: one Canadian economy.Partly on point Procedure · 5 wordsHowever, that was not it.Procedure Claims · 30 wordsWithin that same two- or three-week span, we made the commitment to develop the Major Projects Office, 8and the Prime Minister made it known that we want to hear ideas. Promise · 28 wordsWe want premiers and stakeholders, both private and public, to talk about the types of ideas that are going to allow us to build, and to build big. Claims · 136 wordsA lot of ideas came forward. The provinces stepped up to the plate in a very real and tangible way in every region of our nation. For the first time, we were talking about major projects and how the federal government and the provincial governments, working with others, can expedite, encourage and promote major projects, and ultimately turn them into reality wherever we can. Alberta is a great example. Think of the tension that was within the province of Alberta in a lot of the discussions that were taking place. The Prime Minister, who has roots in the Prairies, in Edmonton in the north, is especially compassionate and wants us to actually move forward on major projects. That is the reason, with respect to pipelines, that we now have an MOU with the Province of Alberta.9Partly on point Procedure · 20 wordsDo members remember when that issue came up and the Prime Minister and the Premier of Alberta made the announcement?Procedure Claims · 29 wordsAll the Alberta Conservative MPs were either sitting on their hands saying nothing or were criticizing the fact that, though we had the MOU, it was not good enough.Off point An hon. member: Oh, oh! Hon. Kevin Lamoureux: Claims · 53 wordsMr. Speaker, they ask, “What is built?” Well, when the leader of the Conservative Party was in government for over 10 years, the Conservatives did not build one inch of pipeline to the coastline.10Off point I will contrast that with what the current Prime Minister has done in one year for the advancement of—

Analysed on