Kevin Lamoureux

Mr. Speaker, Positioning · 54 wordsI will stand by my word, Off pointVague promiseand I look forward to the member coming back to the House and sharing with me which pipeline his leader actually built that went to the west coast.¹ Yes, they did have pipelines that went down to the United States, ²Partly on pointbut let us remember what the argument is.Positioning Some hon. members: Oh, oh! Hon. Kevin Lamoureux: Aside · 19 wordsHe says I am confused, Mr. Speaker. There is a difference between west and east versus north and south.Aside Claims · 8 wordsThe point is that there are major projects.Partly on point Positioning · 35 wordsThe Conservative Party takes one approach, and that approach is just to get out of the way. As a government, we recognize the value of being involved by having things like a sovereign wealth fund, PositioningPromise · 5 wordswhich will make a difference, Vague promiseClaims · 61 wordsand by having things such as the Infrastructure Bank, something the Conservative Party is on the record constantly opposing.³ We have seen literally billions of dollars’ worth of investments in different areas drawn upon by different levels of government and by private industries.⁴ That money was put into the economy: buses, transport, energy and many other aspects. The Canada Strong fund— Some hon. members: Oh, oh! Hon. Kevin Lamoureux: Procedure · 7 wordsMr. Speaker, this is all good stuff, ProcedurePositioning · 49 wordsand if the Conservatives did their homework, they would know it.Partly on point The problem is that all they do is rely too much on their backroom, the spin and ChatGPT. That is what they rely on in terms of delivering their comments on the floor of the House of Commons.Positioning Aside · 9 wordsThe other side has to calm down over there.AsideOff point Reasoning · 80 wordsThe bottom line is that when we see something good come to the floor of the House of Commons, there is nothing wrong with supporting it. There is nothing wrong with saying something is a good thing for Canada. It does not mean a member has to be 100% for it. They could raise some issues in regard to it or raise some concerns, but they should not try to give an impression that it is not good for Canada. Positioning · 39 wordsI believe that whether it is this initiative that we have announced or other initiatives that the government has brought forward, the motivating factor for it all is to reflect on what Canadians are telling us at the door.Positioning Claims · 53 wordsMembers of Parliament, at least within the Liberal caucus, are working with their constituents. They are bringing their thoughts, ideas and concerns here, whether they are about jobs or affordability, and dealing with them in a very tangible way. That is what the spring update does, among many other things. It reassures people. Positioning · 15 wordsThere is comfort in knowing we have a government that wants to expand the economy; PositioningPartly on pointClaims · 68 wordsthat is prepared to help out on the affordability issue by doing things like the groceries and essentials program and reinforcing the dental care program; ⁵and that understands that expanding trade opportunities, bringing in investment dollars and building big projects are all things that are going to help us, whether it is increasing the GDP into the future, increasing people’s wages or providing the jobs that are necessary. Reasoning · 10 wordsThrough that, we are better able to provide social programs. Positioning · 60 wordsIt is time that the Conservatives change their attitude, listen to what they were told in the last election and give more attention to Canadians’ best interests as opposed to the Conservative Party’s best interests. I suspect that if they actually followed that advice, they might do a bit better. Maybe their leader would be more secure into the future.PositioningOff point