Replying to Simon-PierreSavard-Tremblay (Bloc Québécois)
“Mr. Speaker, my colleague described the sovereign wealth fund as something major, a major step, a major event. That is how the government presented it to us as well. When there is a major event like this, it seems to me that the least the government could have done was to consult the opposition parties. We might have had things to say or suggestions to make. That would have been constructive, especially from a government that had promised to work together with the opposition parties, given that it won its majority in a not very legitimate way.”
Statement grade
–
Not graded: fewer than 4 clauses beyond the address. The scores are shown; a grade would say little.
Not graded
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Positioning 16%Claims 33%Promise 51%
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Positioning · 7 wordswe are always open to collaboration here.PositioningVague promiseClaims · 14 wordsOf course, it is our prerogative to introduce and table a spring economic update.Promise · 22 wordsAs the parliamentary secretary, I am absolutely open to suggestions from my hon. colleague and my other colleagues on the opposition side.Vague promise
