“Mr. Speaker, I would put Calgary Centre ahead of Regina—Lewvan in those remarks, but I do respect the way in which the member has brought his issues forward. I see a more optimistic future for the country, including for Saskatchewan. I look at BHP and the Jansen mine. I look at the work that we are doing to support the Foran mine. On a personal level, I am proud of the work that I did alongside his premier, Scott Moe, in working to support prairie farmers and Saskatchewan farmers of canola and peas. Notwithstanding that I know it is the job of the hon. member to hold the government to account and to highlight what he sees as flaws, would the member at least recognize on the floor of the House of Commons that it was some good work at a federal and provincial level to resolve tariffs and to reduce tariffs that matter for farmers and for the folks in his province?”
Statement grade
A
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity.
Average 91 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Procedure 17%Claims 68%Positioning 15%
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Procedure · 14 wordswhat I would recognize is one thing that the member for Kings—Hants left out.ProcedureClaims · 56 wordsNutrien, which is headquartered in Saskatoon, has decided to build a port in Washington state instead of Vancouver because there is so much red tape and bureaucracy.1They have no faith that the federal government would allow them to build in the ports of Vancouver and Prince Rupert.They had to go to the United States.2Positioning · 12 wordsThat is shameful, and it lies at the feet of this government.Positioning
