Analysis · Debate reply · beta

Michael Guglielmin

117 words · 5 sentences · 7 clauses

Replying to Grant Jackson (Conservative)
“Mr. Speaker, in addition to his speech, my colleague has moved a great amendment to what is a disastrous fiscal update from the government. It seems to be unable, despite labelling itself as a “new” Liberal government, to break itself of the habit of continuing to rob the piggy bank of young Canadians and future generations to blow the credit card budget on Liberal fat-cat projects. I wonder if my colleague from Vaughan—Woodbridge has a few more comments to put on the record about what a disaster this fiscal update is for Canadians.”
Statement grade
C+
66 / 100, held down by Signal
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Positioning 67%Claims 33%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Positioning · 48 wordswe would think, given all the turmoil and the disastrous record of the Liberal government over the last 10 years, this “new” government, as Liberals like to label themselves, would have easily been able to divorce itself from the disastrous track record and trajectory of the Liberal government.Positioning Claims · 39 wordsInstead, as we learned this week, it has decided to double the deficit and increase the interest payment on the debt to $80 billion, money that could be used for health care transfers, to lower taxes or for housing.12 Positioning · 30 wordsInstead, it is being used to rob a generation of growth and opportunity. We thought the current Prime Minister would be different.Positioning Instead, we realize he is just another Liberal.Partly on pointMockery

Analysed on