Kevin Lamoureux

Mr. Speaker, Procedure · 15 wordsbefore I get started, I want to briefly make mention of the significance of tomorrow, ProcedureClaims · 263 wordswhich is Red Dress Day.¹ Across our great nation, individuals will be recognizing the tragedy that occurred with the murdered and missing women.² For me, it is important not only to highlight it but also to recognize that even today we still see young girls and women, particularly from the indigenous community, who continue to go missing and be murdered. We have to be diligent and support indigenous leadership, like my colleague from Churchill—Keewatinook Aski, who has a beautiful red broach on, I noticed, in recognition of tomorrow’s special day.Off point The legislation we are talking about for private members’ hour is about a form of discrimination, in many ways, that took place here in Canada. Not very many people are aware of the type of discrimination I am referring to. We are dealing with the issue of sterilization. Many women, we are talking about hundreds, were coerced or forced in one way or another and convinced that the sterilization was absolutely essential.³ It came at a substantial cost, and I am not talking about money. I am talking about human rights. It is quite unfortunate that it took so long for us to recognize, as a nation, that it was being done in some provinces. In Canada, there is a joint responsibility related to many different portfolios, jurisdictional responsibilities between Ottawa and the different provinces. We had some provinces that had a law that supported forcing women, in essence, through coercion and other ways, to be sterilized. B.C. was one, ⁴and there were others. That is a very serious violation of human rights. Reasoning · 10 wordsAt the core of the issue, it is about trust. Claims · 171 wordsThe question I posed to my colleague across the way was to recognize the terror and horror that an individual would have experienced as a survivor. I suspect we would find that many of the women who were put through this tragedy had no sense of what was being done to their bodies, to then find out at a later point that they were sterilized. I can only imagine how difficult it would have been to address the emotions and the fact that they were not able to have a child. Often individuals were completely misled to believe that they could change it in the future. Some people today still think sterilization is something that can be reversed a few years later, ⁵which is not the case. It was particularly devastating to some communities more than others. Indigenous people were targeted, if not intentionally, but I would suggest that it was intentionally by many, to have sterilization. It was the same thing for people with disabilities, where the line was crossed. Reasoning · 47 wordsIt is an issue of trust. When we seek assistance or advice, we have faith in the people in our institutions, that they are going to take a balanced approach in providing advice that is based on medical conditions, some social factors, no doubt, and other considerations. Claims · 70 wordsWe have faith that ultimately was displaced. There was another agenda being served, over and above the interests of the woman who was having to make a difficult decision or, in many ways, on whose behalf a decision was made. One can only appreciate how it is that someone’s human rights, very basic ones, were violated in a situation like that. Coerced sterilization is a serious violation of bodily autonomy. Reasoning · 31 wordsWhether one likes it or not, the bottom line is the realization that it is a woman’s right to decide. We as a society need to support that in every way. Claims · 156 wordsThe legislation before us, Bill S-228, is not the first time we have attempted to get this through, ⁶but I believe that now, given the current political situation and having it at the third reading, we are talking about another hour or hour and a half’s debate before its ultimate passage.⁷ With the support that the legislation has received from the Senate and members of Parliament, current and past, there is no doubt in my mind that this legislation will not only pass but receive royal assent.Unearned certainty That is a good thing. It has taken a long time. As has been pointed out, these sterilization policies were enacted generations ago, probably 60 or 70 years ago.⁸ At the end of the day, the House of Commons is providing clarity on an important issue. The only reason the House is recognizing this is that survivors have had the courage and bravery to continue to talk about it. Anecdote · 17 wordsI remember in the Manitoba legislature, years ago, when I was first made aware of the issue.Anecdote Claims · 96 wordsThere were even issues being raised back then in regard to sterilization and crossing the line between what is advice and consent versus coercion, and it still happens today. It is because of those brave and courageous women from the past who had to live through that experience and then continue to share their experiences that the public and parliamentarians at all levels have become enlightened about the issue, which ultimately has led to the legislation we have before us. Survivors, particularly indigenous women, have been clear about the harm caused by forced or coerced sterilization. Thanks · 19 wordsThey are the ones I would like to recognize in particular and thank for their persistence on the issue.Thanks Claims · 9 wordsThey are the reason the legislation will be passed, Thanks · 31 wordsas well as indigenous leadership, individuals within the disability communities and others, human rights advocates who have seen the violation that has taken place and recognized it for what it is: ThanksClaims · 7 wordsa lack of consent, disinformation and discrimination. Reasoning · 37 wordsIt is important that we recognize all these negative things that have taken place. It is also important to recognize the many different forms and to be diligent so that it does not continue to take place.Vague promise