Analysis · Debate question · beta

James Bezan

Conservative on Military Justice System Modernization Act 2026-05-04

165 words · 6 sentences · 8 clauses

Statement grade

B+

82 / 100, held down by Signal

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Claims 36%Positioning 41%The question 24%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Claims · 26 wordsit is disgusting to see the government actually using closure to shut down debate on such a serious issue, sexual misconduct within the Canadian Armed Forces.¹ Positioning · 45 wordsIt is disgusting that it is taking away the voice of veterans, of people who are surviving military sexual trauma, and not listening to the amendments being brought forward on Bill C-11. I do not know why the government is in a hurry on this.Positioning Claims · 33 wordsWe brought it through committee in a relatively organized manner. We had cross-party support from the Bloc, the Conservatives and the NDP to make amendments based on the testimony we heard at committee, ²Positioning · 22 wordsand now the government wants to ignore all that, shut down debate and use its sneaky majority to stifle democracy right here.Positioning The question · 39 wordsWhy is the minister ignoring veterans and survivors of military sexual trauma and not making sure they have a choice in what justice system they want to use, whether it is the military justice system or the civilian system?

At a glance

Lost points for

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 52

4 of 4 deductions are Signal

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it.What the tags mean “It is disgusting that it is taking away the voice of veterans, of people who are surviving military sexual trauma,”Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it.What the tags mean “and not listening to the amendments being brought forward on Bill C-11.”Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it.What the tags mean “I do not know why the government is in a hurry on this.”Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it.What the tags mean “and now the government wants to ignore all that, shut down debate and use its sneaky majority to stifle democracy right here.”Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.

Relevance · no score

Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.

Respect · 100

0 of 4 deductions are Respect

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Nothing lost points.

Clarity · 100

0 of 4 deductions are Clarity

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

Nothing lost points.

Claims · 2

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1“using closure to shut down debate on such a serious issue”The government has moved a closure motion limiting debate on Bill C-11, the Military Justice System Modernization Act.search
2“cross-party support from the Bloc, the Conservatives and the NDP to make amendments”Amendments to Bill C-11 at committee received support from the Bloc Québécois, the Conservatives and the NDP.search

Analysed on 2026-10-20