Analysis · Debate question · beta

Maxime Blanchette-Joncas

Bloc Québécois on Military Justice System Modernization Act 2026-05-04

103 words · 8 sentences · 9 clauses

Statement grade

Average 91 / 100

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Claims 29%Positioning 21%Reasoning 25%The question 24%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Claims · 20 wordsthe government is transferring sexual offence cases to the civilian courts.¹ They are being taken out of the military system. Positioning · 22 wordsThe problem is that the government is already incapable of making the justice system work, especially when it comes to appointing judges.Positioning Claims · 10 wordsQuebec is short five judges and Canada is short 27.² Reasoning · 26 wordsVictims do not need a change in system. They need justice. For that to happen, the federal government must do its job: It must appoint judges. The question · 25 wordsDoes the government intend to appoint judges as quickly as possible and give the system the resources it needs, instead of just passing the buck?

At a glance

Lost points for

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 74

1 of 1 deductions are Signal

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it.What the tags mean “The problem is that the government is already incapable of making the justice system work, especially when it comes to appointing judges.”Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.

Relevance · no score

Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.

Respect · 100

0 of 1 deductions are Respect

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Nothing lost points.

Clarity · 100

0 of 1 deductions are Clarity

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

Nothing lost points.

Claims · 2

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1“the government is transferring sexual offence cases to the civilian courts”Bill C-11, the Military Justice System Modernization Act, removes the court martial’s jurisdiction over sexual offences alleged to have been committed in Canada, transferring such cases to civilian courts.search
2“Quebec is short five judges and Canada is short 27”Quebec is short five judges and Canada is short 27 judicial appointments.search

Analysed on 2026-10-20