Analysis · Debate reply · beta

Ryan Turnbull

552 words · 32 sentences · 36 clauses

Replying to Cheryl Gallant (Conservative)
“Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to rise on behalf of the answer-seeking Canadians in the riding of Algonquin—Renfrew—Pembroke. Last week, I asked the government if it would end the corporate welfare spending spree and balance the budget. The response from the Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Finance was a misogynistic personal attack. This has become a recurring talking point from the Liberal bro caucus. The Liberals cannot defend their terrible policy, so they resort to invoking the “hysterical woman” trope. This sexist pattern comes straight from the top. The Prime Minister does not like to be questioned by women. He gets chippy and condescending when pressed. He even deployed a classic gaslighting technique when he told Rosemary Barton to look inside herself when she asked about his conflicts of interest. Let us be clear. I am not raising a question of privilege. This is no place for a thin skin. I am happy to throw partisan haymakers, and I can appreciate a sharp, devastating rejoinder. The secretary’s ad hominem attack was just blunt and boring. It was less Cicero in the forum and more Archie Bunker in the La-Z-Boy chair. After 11 years of failure, all the Liberals have left are tired, worn-out personal attacks. This should not be a surprise, considering their policies are just as tired and worn out. The Liberal sovereign debt fund is just repeating the failure of the clean growth fund. The clean growth fund is just repeating the failure of the Canadian Infrastructure Bank. The Infrastructure Bank is just repeating the failure of the supercluster strategy. The supercluster strategy was just the Liberals’ doubling down on the failure of the cluster strategy. The Liberals continue to fail over and over again yet never learn a fundamental lesson: One cannot beat the market. It does not matter if one has a Ph.D. in economics from Oxford. No one is smarter than the collective decision-making of 40 million Canadians. Unfortunately, while no one person can outsmart the market, someone can outsmart a government. Call this the Enron-Brookfield business model. Rather than compete in the market, they lobby the government to regulate a market into existence and to then regulate out the competition. They do not need a secret cabal to execute this strategy. They just need to put the word “sovereign” before our business pitch and watch the CBC lobby for them. They can rebrand their concrete slab into a sovereign spaceport and wait for the government to give them a 10-year exclusive, sole-source contract. Unlike the arrogant Liberal approach, our Conservative economic plan is based in humility. We cannot know the future, so we let a thousand flowers bloom. We create the conditions where anyone with a sound business plan has a chance to build a successful venture. We do not pick and choose who gets special political exemptions from Liberal red tape. We will cut the Liberal red tape and lower taxes for everyone equally. This is the same approach millions of Canadians take to investing. They do not try to pick individual stocks. They purchase exchange-traded funds to buy the market. This agnostic approach to economic growth has proven to be superior to the Liberals’ faith-based approach. Unfortunately, Canadians are stuck living in the church of climate socialism for the next three years. This is a choice Canadians will face next time: our Conservative approach, rooted in reality and humility, or the Liberal approach, based on economic arrogance defensible only through personal insults.”
Statement grade
B–
71 / 100, held down by Relevance
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Procedure 3%Positioning 10%Claims 73%Reasoning 11%Promise 4%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Procedure · 16 wordsI am really glad to be here this evening to answer the member for Algonquin—Renfrew—Pembroke’s question.Procedure Positioning · 34 wordsWhile she is very entertaining in her remarks, Canadians know that these are uncertain times and that global volatility is something our government takes seriously.Unearned certainty Responsible leadership is really what matters more than ever.Positioning Claims · 54 wordsAround the world, inflation, conflict and economic volatility are putting pressure on families and governments alike. In response, our government is focused on what we can control, which is managing public finances responsibly while investing where it matters most. That is exactly what the spring economic update delivers or at least shows progress on. Positioning · 9 wordsCanada enters this moment from a position of strength.Positioning Claims · 66 wordsOur economy has proven more resilient than anticipated in the face of global disruption. Inflation remains within the Bank of Canada’s target range.1 Investment and business confidence are recovering after two massive shocks: the oil price shock and the tariff war before it. The strong fundamentals that we reported on in the spring economic update allow us to make smart, targeted choices without compromising fiscal discipline. Reasoning · 11 wordsFiscal responsibility means making sure every dollar works harder for Canadians. Claims · 71 wordsThat is why our government is preserving fiscal sustainability for future generations, keeping debt manageable and maintaining Canada’s long-standing fiscal advantage among G7 countries. The member opposite will note that the IMF has recently said that Canada has the strongest fiscal position in the G7.2 We had that confirmed by the bank governor today at the finance committee who said the same, that we are the envy of many other countries.3 Promise · 10 wordsOur government is committed to reducing spending on government operations. Claims · 89 wordsWe have generated $60 billion in savings over five years to ensure public funds are focused on high-impact priorities rather than administrative costs.4 We also have moved forward with a capital budgeting framework so that a greater portion of the investments the government is making can be seen to be revenue-generating and separated out with respect to reporting, in order to understand their impact.Partly on point We are focused on high-impact priorities, including building more homes, advancing major nation-building projects, strengthening our defence industry and unlocking private investment across the country. Promise · 10 wordsWe are really seeking to catalyze $1 trillion in investment.5 Claims · 49 wordsWe are well on our way. We have seen a lot of commitments to invest in Canada. The UAE has committed $70 billion.6 Australian investors have committed $10 billion.7 We have $125 billion for 15 major projects that we will see creating about 60,000 or more jobs across Canada.8 Positioning · 7 wordsThese are results Canadians can bank on.Positioning Claims · 46 wordsWe are also seeing some of the results of productivity-boosting deductions that we have offered businesses that are investing in R and D, IP protection, new information technology within their businesses and the like. There are a number of different tax deductions that we have offered, Reasoning · 15 wordswhich are allowing businesses to invest in themselves, in turn boosting productivity and the economy. Claims · 27 wordsWe are seeing wages double at the pace of inflation.9 That is a trend that has been continuing to increase year over year for three years now.10 Positioning · 6 wordsThat is good news for Canadians.Positioning Reasoning · 32 wordsI know we all can agree that productivity needs to continue to rise in order to see that standard of living rise as well, which is what Canadians all want to see.Partly on point

Analysed on