“Mr. Speaker, indeed, things always get a bit loud right before oral question period. I want to congratulate my colleague on her speech. I also have some questions for her about forestry. Can she explain to us again what we are proposing, what the industry and the unions are proposing, which is that the government take on part of the countervailing duties? Once the dispute is resolved, it will be returned to the industry, so the government would get its money back. This would allow the industry to continue exporting to the United States, despite the immoral and in fact illegal tariffs imposed by the irascible U.S. President.”
Statement grade
A
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity.
Average 92 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Procedure · 19 wordssometimes people say that to ask a question is to answer it, and that is what the member did.ProcedureClaims · 30 wordsHowever, it is true that there is money that is sitting idle, that is, the $4.4 billion that is being unused and that should be going back to the workers.1Reasoning · 25 wordsThe bottom line is that government has an opportunity to ensure that this money can be used by the industry to get through the crisis.Claims · 33 wordsThis measure really comes at no cost to the government.The money is there, it is not being used.I do not understand why the government is not accepting this Bloc Québécois proposal, Positioning · 14 wordsor the other proposals made today, which are all just as relevant and meaningful.Positioning
