Analysis · Question Period question · beta

Pierre Poilievre

Conservative on Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship 2026-05-05

80 words · 5 sentences · 6 clauses

Statement grade

A+

Average 100 / 100

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Claims 79%The question 21%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Claims · 63 wordsaccording to her testimony, this is the same Liberal minister who meets with the Prime Minister to chat every week.¹ Her department gave an entry permit to an Iranian terrorist.² A brief Google search would have shown that he does not belong here in Canada. The Auditor General confirmed that the Liberals do not screen non-citizens, allowing widespread fraud in the student system.³ The question · 17 wordsWill the Prime Minister fire his incompetent minister, or is this incompetence on the Prime Minister himself?

At a glance

Nothing lost points.

Choose a measurement above to see how it scored.

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 100

Nothing lost points on Signal.

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Relevance · no score

Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.

Respect · 100

Nothing lost points on Respect.

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Clarity · 100

Nothing lost points on Clarity.

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

Claims · 3

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1“according to her testimony”The minister testified, in her testimony, that she meets with the Prime Minister every week.search
2“gave an entry permit to an Iranian terrorist”Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada issued an entry permit to an Iranian terrorist.search
3“The Auditor General confirmed that the Liberals do not screen non-citizens, allowing widespread fraud in the student system”The Auditor General confirmed that non-citizens are not screened and that widespread fraud exists in the student system.search

Analysed on 2026-10-20