← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity is 56. The grade is held to 49, 30 above Signal.
49 / 100, held down by Signal
Signal
19 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
41 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Respect
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Clarity
63 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Positioning 79% Claims 21%
Structure · 4 steps
Claims · 1
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Positioning · 59 words on one hand, they say that families do not want help. They have fought against school food programs. They have fought against early learning and child care. They have fought against support for families. Now, when we actually move forward to support the skilled trades community and get more great-paying jobs across the country, they fight against that too. Positioning Vague promise Claims · 22 words Here is what Russ Shewchuk from IBEW said: “This announcement will supercharge the skilled trades across Canada” and help build Canada strong.1 Positioning · 26 words Let me ask the question, what do they support? Do they support hard-working people? Do they support hungry kids? Partly on point It is clear they do not have— Positioning Off point Unearned certainty
At a glance
Lost points for Partly on point ×10 Positioning ×9 Vague promise Off point Unearned certainty
Didn't answer None of this answer addressed the specific question that was asked.
Little substance Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 19
9 of 22 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “on one hand, they say that families do not want help.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “They have fought against school food programs.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “They have fought against early learning and child care.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “They have fought against support for families.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Now, when we actually move forward to support the skilled trades community and get more great-paying jobs across the country, they fight against that too.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Let me ask the question, what do they support?” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Do they support hard-working people?” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Do they support hungry kids?” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “It is clear they do not have—” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Relevance · 41
11 of 22 deductions are Relevance
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the question asked.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “on one hand, they say that families do not want help.” A claim about the opposition’s position on family help, not the carbon or gas taxes asked about.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “They have fought against school food programs.” About the opposition’s record on school food programs, not the taxes asked about.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “They have fought against early learning and child care.” About the opposition’s record on child care, not the taxes asked about.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “They have fought against support for families.” About the opposition’s record on family support, not the taxes asked about.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “Now, when we actually move forward to support the skilled trades community and get more great-paying jobs across the country, they fight against that too.” About skilled trades support and the opposition’s stance on it, not the taxes asked about.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “Here is what Russ Shewchuk from IBEW said:” Introduces a union endorsement of a skills announcement, not the taxes asked about.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → ““This announcement will supercharge the skilled trades across Canada” and help build Canada strong.” Quotes praise of a skilled trades announcement, not the taxes asked about.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “Let me ask the question, what do they support?” A rhetorical question about what the opposition supports, not the taxes asked about.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “Do they support hard-working people?” A rhetorical question about the opposition’s support for workers, not the taxes asked about.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “Do they support hungry kids?” A rhetorical question about the opposition and hungry kids, not the taxes asked about.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “It is clear they do not have—” An unfinished assertion that the opposition does not support people, addressing nothing in the question.
Respect · 100
0 of 22 deductions are Respect
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Nothing lost points.
Clarity · 63
2 of 22 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Vague promise A promise with no date, no measure and no one responsible. What the tags mean → “move forward to support the skilled trades community” No measure, date or actor is named for how this support will be delivered.
Unearned certainty Something stated as certain with nothing to back it. What the tags mean → “It is clear” The assertion of a conclusion is presented as self-evident rather than backed by a source.
Claims · 1
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “This announcement will supercharge the skilled trades across Canada” Russ Shewchuk of IBEW said the government’s skilled trades announcement ‘will supercharge the skilled trades across Canada’. search