← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Respect and Clarity. Average 100 / 100
Signal
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
–
Not scored Viewing ↓
Respect
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Clarity
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 82% The question 18%
Structure · 3 steps
Claims · 5
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Claims · 78 words the minister just claimed that their plan is working, 1 yet in the last week alone, we found out that the Liberal government issued a special visa to a terrorist so he could enter Canada.2 It allowed over 21,000 non-citizens who fraudulently came into Canada to claim asylum, 3 and it has no way to track if millions of non-citizens on expired or expiring visas would leave.4 The Prime Minister said that this is taking control of the immigration system.5 The question · 17 words If that is his opinion, is that the real reason why he has not fired his minister?
At a glance
Nothing lost points.
Choose a measurement above to see how it scored.
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 100
Nothing lost points on Signal.
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Relevance · no score
Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.
Respect · 100
Nothing lost points on Respect.
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Clarity · 100
Nothing lost points on Clarity.
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Claims · 5
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “the minister just claimed that their plan is working” The immigration minister said in the House on 2026-05-05 that the government’s immigration plan is working. search 2 “issued a special visa to a terrorist so he could enter Canada” The Liberal government issued a special visa to a terrorist allowing entry to Canada, as reported in the last week before 2026-05-05. search 3 “over 21,000 non-citizens who fraudulently came into Canada to claim asylum” Over 21,000 non-citizens who fraudulently came into Canada to claim asylum were allowed into Canada by the government, as revealed in the last week before 2026-05-05. search 4 “no way to track if millions of non-citizens on expired or expiring visas would leave” The government has no way to track whether millions of non-citizens on expired or expiring visas would leave Canada. search 5 “The Prime Minister said that this is taking control of the immigration system” The Prime Minister said the government’s immigration approach is taking control of the immigration system. search