Analysis · Question Period question · beta

Michelle Rempel Garner

Conservative on Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship 2026-05-05

85 words · 5 sentences · 5 clauses

Statement grade

60 / 100, held down by Signal

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Positioning 67%Claims 29%The question 4%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Positioning · 32 wordswhen we listen to that answer and then listen to the Prime Minister say that the Liberals have taken back control of the immigration system, it kind of sounds a little delulu.Positioning Claims · 25 wordsThe entire system is rife with abuse. There is no way to track if non-citizens actually leave and they are issuing visitor visas to terrorists.¹² Positioning · 25 wordsIf this is the Prime Minister’s definition of what taking control of the immigration system is, then the dumpster fire is his fault, not hers.Positioning The question · 3 wordsDoes she agree?

At a glance

Lost points for
Little substanceMuch of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 30

2 of 2 deductions are Signal

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it.What the tags mean “when we listen to that answer and then listen to the Prime Minister say that the Liberals have taken back control of the immigration system, it kind of sounds a little delulu.”Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it.What the tags mean “If this is the Prime Minister’s definition of what taking control of the immigration system is, then the dumpster fire is his fault, not hers.”Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.

Relevance · no score

Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.

Respect · 100

0 of 2 deductions are Respect

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Nothing lost points.

Clarity · 100

0 of 2 deductions are Clarity

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

Nothing lost points.

Claims · 2

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1“There is no way to track if non-citizens actually leave”Canada’s immigration system has no way to track whether non-citizens actually leave the country.search
2“they are issuing visitor visas to terrorists”Canada is issuing visitor visas to terrorists.search

Analysed on 2026-10-20