“Mr. Speaker, once again the Prime Minister is padding the pockets of consultants, insiders and elites while Canadians pay the price for his costly credit card budget. The Liberals blew $300 million on PrescribeIT with nothing to show for it. They said they were going to axe the fax, but instead they just embraced the waste. Now we learn that the health minister paid the Liberal-appointed head of the program $900,000 per year. No wonder they shut down a committee investigation into it. When will the Prime Minister cut the waste, cut the corruption and look out for ordinary Canadians for a change?”
Statement grade
F
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity is 67. The grade is held to 30, 30 above Relevance.
30 / 100, held down by Relevance
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Aside 27%The ask 73%
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Aside · 20 wordswe have a new winner: most empty slogans in one single question, which was just won by the member across.AsideThe ask · 53 wordsThe thing the Conservatives could deliver, the thing I think Canadians would appreciate, the thing that would add to the substance of this debate, is whether he will cut the empty slogans and table that list of things that they think are inflationary spending and that they would cut and deprive Canadians of.Off point
