Analysis · Question Period question · beta

Mark Strahl

Conservative on Indigenous Affairs 2026-05-06

100 words · 3 sentences · 4 clauses

Statement grade

A+

Average 100 / 100

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Claims 71%The question 29%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Claims · 71 wordsBritish Columbians bought their homes, paid their mortgages and played by the rules, but due to the Cowichan decision, they now face uncertainty as to whether their private property will be protected going forward.¹ Instead of arguing in favour of those rights in the Cowichan case, this Liberal government told federal lawyers not to defend those rights through litigation directive number 14, a directive that is still active to this day.²³ The question · 29 wordsHow can British Columbians believe that this Liberal Prime Minister will stand up for their private property rights when his government guidelines are telling his lawyers to stand down?

At a glance

Nothing lost points.

Choose a measurement above to see how it scored.

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 100

Nothing lost points on Signal.

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Relevance · no score

Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.

Respect · 100

Nothing lost points on Respect.

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Clarity · 100

Nothing lost points on Clarity.

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

Claims · 3

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1“the Cowichan decision”A court issued a Cowichan decision affecting private property rights in British Columbia.search
2“litigation directive number 14”Canada’s Department of Justice has a litigation directive number 14 that is still active.search
3“told federal lawyers not to defend those rights through litigation directive number 14”Litigation directive number 14 directs federal lawyers not to defend private property rights in cases like the Cowichan case.search

Analysed on 2026-10-20