Analysis · Question Period question · beta

Don Davies

NDP on Health 2026-05-06

87 words · 5 sentences · 9 clauses

Statement grade

A+

Average 100 / 100

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Claims 74%Reasoning 11%The question 15%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Claims · 48 wordslegal experts just confirmed what New Democrats have been warning for months: Alberta’s private health care law violates the Canada Health Act.¹ Danielle Smith’s two-tier scheme lets wealthy patients pay to jump the line, ²while everyone else waits longer. This breaks a core principle of public health care: Reasoning · 10 wordsaccess must be based on need, not ability to pay. Claims · 16 wordsUpholding this value is the federal government’s job, but the Liberals have refused to do it.³ The question · 13 wordsWhy is the Prime Minister doing nothing while Conservatives dismantle public health care?

At a glance

Nothing lost points.

Choose a measurement above to see how it scored.

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 100

Nothing lost points on Signal.

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Relevance · no score

Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.

Respect · 100

Nothing lost points on Respect.

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Clarity · 100

Nothing lost points on Clarity.

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

Claims · 3

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1“Alberta’s private health care law violates the Canada Health Act”Legal experts concluded in early May 2026 that Alberta’s private health care law violates the Canada Health Act.search
2“lets wealthy patients pay to jump the line”Alberta’s private health care law allows patients to pay out of pocket for faster access to care.search
3“the Liberals have refused to do it”The federal Liberal government has declined to take action against Alberta’s private health care law under the Canada Health Act.search

Analysed on 2026-10-20