“Mr. Speaker, the essence of the motion that we have before us today is that it is trying to give the false impression that the government does not support private land rights, which is just not the case. Every Conservative member knows that. The damage of bringing forward motions of this nature, which significantly mislead Canadians, has a great cost. We talk a great deal about reconciliation, and this is a step backwards. The Prime Minister and the minister responsible have been very clear. The question I have for the member is, why does the Conservative Party want to promote fear when there is no need to do so?”
Statement grade
A–
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity is 86. The grade is held to 85, 30 above Signal.
85 / 100, held down by Signal
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Positioning 39%Claims 61%
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Positioning · 13 wordsas I said, Liberal members continue to throw out any concerns as misinformation.PositioningClaims · 58 wordsWhat is not misinformation is that in 2019, the Liberals adopted litigation guideline number 14, telling federal lawyers to avoid defending property rights.1That directive is still enforced today despite multiple calls by Conservative members for the Prime Minister to show Canadians that he means what he says.2He has yet to take us up on that offer.Positioning · 9 wordsWe have Liberals saying that it is all misinformation, PositioningClaims · 7 wordsbut it is on the government website.Positioning · 15 wordsIf it is misinformation, is the government now the biggest misleader on this particular case?PositioningClaims · 10 wordsIf we read the website, that is what it says.Positioning · 10 wordsThe member cannot say otherwise because it is the truth.PositioningUnearned certainty
