“Mr. Speaker, it is always a pleasure to rise on behalf of the people from Kamloops—Thompson—Nicola. We just heard from a B.C. member from Surrey. I have to say that it sounded like a bureaucrat wrote the speech. The reason why I say that is that he read the whole speech. In fact, I asked him a question, and he read from a piece of paper an answer that had nothing to do with the question. My hon. colleague clearly wrote his own speech. I am wondering what message it sends when the Liberals are just reading talking points and accusing us of fearmongering. Why do they not go to the houses in Richmond and the places in Vancouver and ask how people feel about having a higher mortgage rate or not being able to get home insurance? Why do they not do that?”
Statement grade
A+
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity.
Average 96 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 64%The ask 23%Positioning 12%
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Claims · 40 wordsif members read any newspaper in British Columbia, they are going to read about the mayor of Richmond, who has broadly raised this issue while the province and federal government said nothing.12They made clear representation on private property rights.The ask · 30 wordsAll we are asking in this motion today, and of Liberal members, is to start listening to British Columbians and those they have elected who have been raising this alarm.Claims · 43 wordsThey have had lots of time.The fact that they are now sending out members from British Columbia who are just reading talking points, basically giving the same line without concrete action, says to me that they are prepared to vote against this, Positioning · 16 wordsbecause they truly do not protect the private property rights of British Columbians or anyone else.Positioning
