← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Respect and Clarity. Average 96 / 100
Signal
88 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
–
Not scored Viewing ↓
Respect
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Clarity
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Procedure 8% Claims 61% Positioning 9% The question 23%
Structure · 5 steps
Claims · 4
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Procedure · 7 words let me explain “stupid” to the minister. Insult Claims · 56 words He gifted $20 million, backdated to a company on the brink of bankruptcy.1 The company’s chairman, someone with a history of securities infractions, made millions on a quick pump-and-dump sale of shares.2 The lease that taxpayers are paying for is nowhere in the company’s previous regulatory filings.3 The company’s Liberal insiders met with officials 158 times.4 Positioning · 8 words Someone is going to face the music here. Positioning The question · 21 words Will it be the Liberal insiders who were stuffing money into their jeans or the minister who signed this God-awful document?
At a glance
Lost points for Insult Positioning
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 88
1 of 2 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Someone is going to face the music here.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Relevance · no score
Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.
Respect · 100
1 of 2 deductions are Respect
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Insult An insult aimed at a person. What the tags mean → “let me explain “stupid” to the minister” It derides the minister himself as stupid rather than any decision or record.
Clarity · 100
0 of 2 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Nothing lost points.
Claims · 4
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “He gifted $20 million, backdated to a company on the brink of bankruptcy” The minister gifted $20 million, backdated, to a company on the brink of bankruptcy. search 2 “made millions on a quick pump-and-dump sale of shares” The company’s chairman made millions on a quick pump-and-dump sale of shares. search 3 “nowhere in the company’s previous regulatory filings” The lease that taxpayers are paying for does not appear anywhere in the company’s previous regulatory filings. search 4 “met with officials 158 times” The company’s Liberal insiders met with government officials 158 times. search
