← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Respect and Clarity. Average 100 / 100
Signal
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
–
Not scored Viewing ↓
Respect
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Clarity
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 87% The question 13%
Structure · 3 steps
Claims · 5
Echo · 2 repeated lines
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Claims · 80 words British Columbians bought their homes, paid their mortgages and followed the law , but because the Liberal government directed its lawyers not to argue for property rights in the Cowichan case , the judge did not protect private property.1 In 2019, the Liberal government issued a directive called litigation guideline number 14, 2 which discourages federal lawyers from defending property rights in court.3 The Liberal Prime Minister has kept that guideline in place.4 In fact, it is still on the government’s website today.5 The question · 12 words Why do the Liberals continue to tell lawyers not to defend homeowners?
At a glance
Echo ×4 “Because the Liberal government directed its lawyers not to argue for property rights in the Cowichan case.” Said 4 times by 3 members. Every time it was said → Echo ×4 “Paid their mortgages and followed the law.” Said 4 times by 3 members. Every time it was said →
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 100
Nothing lost points on Signal.
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Relevance · no score
Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.
Respect · 100
Nothing lost points on Respect.
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Clarity · 100
Nothing lost points on Clarity.
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Echo · 2 repeated lines
Words members of Parliament keep repeating, found by the same rule for every member. No score depends on it.
“Because the Liberal government directed its lawyers not to argue for property rights in the Cowichan case.” Said 4 times by 3 members. Every time it was said → “Paid their mortgages and followed the law.” Said 4 times by 3 members. Every time it was said →
Claims · 5
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “directed its lawyers not to argue for property rights in the Cowichan case” The Canadian government directed its lawyers not to argue for property rights in the Cowichan Aboriginal title case. search 2 “In 2019, the Liberal government issued a directive called litigation guideline number 14” In 2019, the Canadian government issued a directive called litigation guideline number 14. search 3 “discourages federal lawyers from defending property rights in court” Litigation guideline number 14 discourages federal lawyers from defending property rights in court. search 4 “The Liberal Prime Minister has kept that guideline in place” The current Canadian Prime Minister has kept litigation guideline number 14 in place. search 5 “it is still on the government’s website today” Litigation guideline number 14 was still posted on the Government of Canada’s website as of May 7, 2026. search
