Claims 31% Positioning 32% Procedure 12% Anecdote 21% Reasoning 2% Promise 2%
Structure · 31 steps
Claims · 6
Echo · 2 repeated lines
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Claims · 14 words I have the incredible pleasure of serving as MP for a northern Saskatchewan seat. Positioning · 28 words As an indigenous person within the House of Commons, I feel compelled to make sure we correct the record, in terms of what the opposition motion is suggesting. Positioning Procedure · 77 words I want to point out I will be sharing my time with the member for Winnipeg North. Before I get into my presentation, I want to say that somewhere along the lines of discussion, it is important to call upon all our intentions when we talk about the country of Canada. I want to briefly expand on that notion before I do my critique of the Conservatives’ presentation. First of all, to clarify to all of Canada, Procedure Claims · 104 words and to the folks who might be paying attention to this particular debate, on May 5 the Prime Minister said, “The government will always defend private property rights.1 We immediately appealed the Cowichan decision. 2 We have always defended private property rights; we always will, and we will always defend the rights of indigenous peoples to build a Canada that is stronger, fairer and more independent. ” That is the Prime Minister of Canada being very clear as to the whole notion around private property rights as the Cowichan decision impacts some of those statements. I listened to the presentation by the Leader of the Opposition, Positioning · 46 words and I reject the premise of his presentation because it is not intended to provide solutions to the problems. It is really intended to divide Canadians, in my opinion, for cheap political theatrics, and that is something that should never happen in the House of Commons. Positioning Claims · 61 words I want to point out that, from the whole perspective of Canada as a country, those who helped build this nation were the first nations, the Métis people, the Innu and many other indigenous groups throughout the land. We stood side by side through centuries of conflict and through centuries of negotiations but more so through centuries of sharing the land. Off point Positioning · 32 words From our perspective, I ask, “What is our responsibility to the country as a whole?” as we grapple through some of these issues that impact not only B.C. but Saskatchewan and Alberta. Positioning Partly on point Claims · 48 words We see many good examples of how Canadians, first nations Canadians, non-indigenous Canadians, Innu Canadians, Inuit Canadians, Métis Canadians and non-status Canadians, many from my own communities, are trying to keep this country together. All of the discussions we are having here are about strengthening and uniting Canada, Off point Procedure · 14 words and that is an important point that I want to raise during this discussion. Procedure Claims · 11 words I listened to the presentation by the Leader of the Opposition, Positioning · 175 words and all I see is division from some of the points he raised. On one hand, he is suggesting that we do not look at any other agreements of this sort. That is what I understood from his presentation. On the other hand, the member for Edmonton Northwest said we need to strengthen the treaties.3 How does that work? They cannot give the same speech with a contrasting view like that, trying to be everything to everybody, because, quite frankly, they will be nothing to nobody if they do not make up their minds on which perspective they want to support. I see a huge divide within the Conservative caucus. They say one thing on one hand, and they say something extremely different on the other hand. Sooner or later, Canadians are going to catch on to that. As I stand here today, I ask Canadians, who is looking after Canada’s interests, and why is it important to me as an indigenous person and to indigenous folks, whether we are from B.C., Saskatchewan or Alberta? Positioning Partly on point Procedure · 4 words It is very clear, Procedure Claims · 19 words as the member from B.C. mentioned earlier, that there is no threat to private property ownership in this bill. Positioning · 24 words Why do the Conservatives want to make it out to be a threat to Canadians? It is because it is in their political interests. Positioning Procedure · 11 words We can look at the Canadian perspective, as I mentioned before. Procedure Anecdote · 64 words I was raised in a household with a father who was a World War II veteran.4 He was Métis, and his mom was an indigenous woman. Every day when my dad came home from his service to Canada during the Second World War, he spoke about the value of Canada as a whole. As an indigenous person, he was proud to serve his country. Anecdote Off point Reasoning · 27 words Somewhere along the line, Canada’s interests need to be maintained in all of these discussions, through respectful dialogue and discussions among the many provinces that are impacted. Partly on point Procedure · 11 words I look at modern examples today of who is strengthening Canada. Procedure Positioning · 17 words I reject the member for Edmonton Northwest’s notion that we are creating division. We absolutely are not. Positioning Claims · 20 words This government is working very hard to deal with economic reconciliation and to engage the indigenous community on many fronts. Positioning · 42 words I dare say that I would compare our record on any day of the week to the Conservative record when it comes to indigenous rights, indigenous opportunities and the indigenous right to sit with us as partners in developing this great country. Positioning Claims · 45 words At the end of the day, there are many indigenous people across this country who are trying to strengthen our country in all kinds of ways. Many times I talk to the people in my riding about social and economic justice for the indigenous people, Promise · 16 words and we will achieve that as long as we have respectful dialogue between all parties engaged. Off point Vague promise Procedure · 4 words In the Cowichan decision, Procedure Promise · 9 words as I mentioned, we will respect private property ownership. Vague promise Anecdote · 175 words Now, I will go back to my father’s service to this country. It is a beautiful country. We had a number of family members serve in the military. They include my older brother who served as a warrant officer in the air force and my younger brother who served as a warrant officer in the army.5 I had a sister who also served in the air force, 6 and my daughter almost joined the navy until her mother talked her out of it. The fact of the matter is that we come from a proud military history within my family. How did we get that service-to-Canada perspective? It came from our father, who was a World War II veteran who spoke about the value of keeping Canada together. He was one solid, strong patriot, and yet he was indigenous. If he saw the discussion here today, Off point and the talk about dividing the country over indigenous rights versus private property rights, he would say to us that it is important to keep our country strong and together. Anecdote Procedure · 21 words Again, our Prime Minister has been very clear. For the record, I am going to read to the opposition his quote: Procedure Claims · 45 words “The government will always defend private property rights. We immediately appealed the Cowichan decision. We have always defended private property rights; we always will, and we will always defend the rights of indigenous peoples to build a Canada that is stronger, fairer and more independent.” Anecdote · 16 words Those are the exact same words that I think my father would say to us all. Anecdote Positioning · 17 words Let us make Canada stronger, let us make Canada fairer, and let us make Canada more independent. Positioning Off point
At a glance
Lost points for Off point ×26 Positioning ×25 Anecdote ×19 Procedure ×12 Partly on point ×4 Vague promise ×2
Little substance Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.
Echo ×3 “We have always defended private property rights; we always will, and we will always defend the rights of indigenous peoples to build a Canada that is stronger, fairer and more independent.” Said 3 times by 3 members. Every time it was said →
Echo ×3 “We immediately appealed the Cowichan decision.” Said 3 times by 3 members. Every time it was said →
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 32
56 of 88 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “As an indigenous person within the House of Commons, I feel compelled to make sure we correct the record, in terms of what the opposition motion is suggesting.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “I want to point out I will be sharing my time with the member for Winnipeg North.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “Before I get into my presentation, I want to say that somewhere along the lines of discussion, it is important to call upon all our intentions when we talk about the country of Canada.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “I want to briefly expand on that notion before I do my critique of the Conservatives’ presentation.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “First of all, to clarify to all of Canada,” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “and I reject the premise of his presentation because it is not intended to provide solutions to the problems.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “It is really intended to divide Canadians, in my opinion, for cheap political theatrics,” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “and that is something that should never happen in the House of Commons.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “From our perspective, I ask, “What is our responsibility to the country as a whole?” as we grapple through some of these issues that impact not only B.C. but Saskatchewan and Alberta.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “and that is an important point that I want to raise during this discussion.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “and all I see is division from some of the points he raised.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “On one hand, he is suggesting that we do not look at any other agreements of this sort.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “That is what I understood from his presentation.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “On the other hand, the member for Edmonton Northwest said we need to strengthen the treaties.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “How does that work?” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “They cannot give the same speech with a contrasting view like that, trying to be everything to everybody,” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “because, quite frankly, they will be nothing to nobody if they do not make up their minds on which perspective they want to support.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “I see a huge divide within the Conservative caucus.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “They say one thing on one hand,” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “and they say something extremely different on the other hand.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Sooner or later, Canadians are going to catch on to that.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “As I stand here today, I ask Canadians, who is looking after Canada’s interests,” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “and why is it important to me as an indigenous person and to indigenous folks, whether we are from B.C., Saskatchewan or Alberta?” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “It is very clear,” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Why do the Conservatives want to make it out to be a threat to Canadians?” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “It is because it is in their political interests.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “We can look at the Canadian perspective,” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “as I mentioned before.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Anecdote A story that illustrates instead of making a point. What the tags mean → “I was raised in a household with a father who was a World War II veteran.” An anecdote: it illustrates, it does not claim, reason or ask.
Anecdote A story that illustrates instead of making a point. What the tags mean → “He was Métis,” An anecdote: it illustrates, it does not claim, reason or ask.
Anecdote A story that illustrates instead of making a point. What the tags mean → “and his mom was an indigenous woman.” An anecdote: it illustrates, it does not claim, reason or ask.
Anecdote A story that illustrates instead of making a point. What the tags mean → “Every day when my dad came home from his service to Canada during the Second World War, he spoke about the value of Canada as a whole.” An anecdote: it illustrates, it does not claim, reason or ask.
Anecdote A story that illustrates instead of making a point. What the tags mean → “As an indigenous person, he was proud to serve his country.” An anecdote: it illustrates, it does not claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “I look at modern examples today of who is strengthening Canada.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “I reject the member for Edmonton Northwest’s notion that we are creating division.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “We absolutely are not.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “I dare say that I would compare our record on any day of the week to the Conservative record when it comes to indigenous rights, indigenous opportunities and the indigenous right to sit with us as partners in developing this great country.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “In the Cowichan decision,” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Anecdote A story that illustrates instead of making a point. What the tags mean → “Now, I will go back to my father’s service to this country.” An anecdote: it illustrates, it does not claim, reason or ask.
Anecdote A story that illustrates instead of making a point. What the tags mean → “It is a beautiful country.” An anecdote: it illustrates, it does not claim, reason or ask.
Anecdote A story that illustrates instead of making a point. What the tags mean → “We had a number of family members serve in the military.” An anecdote: it illustrates, it does not claim, reason or ask.
Anecdote A story that illustrates instead of making a point. What the tags mean → “They include my older brother who served as a warrant officer in the air force and my younger brother who served as a warrant officer in the army.” An anecdote: it illustrates, it does not claim, reason or ask.
Anecdote A story that illustrates instead of making a point. What the tags mean → “I had a sister who also served in the air force,” An anecdote: it illustrates, it does not claim, reason or ask.
Anecdote A story that illustrates instead of making a point. What the tags mean → “and my daughter almost joined the navy until her mother talked her out of it.” An anecdote: it illustrates, it does not claim, reason or ask.
Anecdote A story that illustrates instead of making a point. What the tags mean → “The fact of the matter is that we come from a proud military history within my family.” An anecdote: it illustrates, it does not claim, reason or ask.
Anecdote A story that illustrates instead of making a point. What the tags mean → “How did we get that service-to-Canada perspective?” An anecdote: it illustrates, it does not claim, reason or ask.
Anecdote A story that illustrates instead of making a point. What the tags mean → “It came from our father, who was a World War II veteran who spoke about the value of keeping Canada together.” An anecdote: it illustrates, it does not claim, reason or ask.
Anecdote A story that illustrates instead of making a point. What the tags mean → “He was one solid, strong patriot,” An anecdote: it illustrates, it does not claim, reason or ask.
Anecdote A story that illustrates instead of making a point. What the tags mean → “and yet he was indigenous.” An anecdote: it illustrates, it does not claim, reason or ask.
Anecdote A story that illustrates instead of making a point. What the tags mean → “If he saw the discussion here today,” An anecdote: it illustrates, it does not claim, reason or ask.
Anecdote A story that illustrates instead of making a point. What the tags mean → “and the talk about dividing the country over indigenous rights versus private property rights, he would say to us that it is important to keep our country strong and together.” An anecdote: it illustrates, it does not claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “Again, our Prime Minister has been very clear.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “For the record, I am going to read to the opposition his quote:” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Anecdote A story that illustrates instead of making a point. What the tags mean → “Those are the exact same words that I think my father would say to us all.” An anecdote: it illustrates, it does not claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Let us make Canada stronger, let us make Canada fairer,” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “and let us make Canada more independent.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Relevance · 66
30 of 88 deductions are Relevance
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the motion under debate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “I want to point out that, from the whole perspective of Canada as a country, those who helped build this nation were the first nations, the Métis people, the Innu and many other indigenous groups throughout the land.” About indigenous contributions to building the nation, not the Cowichan motion.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We stood side by side through centuries of conflict and through centuries of negotiations but more so through centuries of sharing the land.” About centuries of shared history, not the motion’s subject.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “From our perspective, I ask, “What is our responsibility to the country as a whole?” as we grapple through some of these issues that impact not only B.C. but Saskatchewan and Alberta.” A broad question about the country’s responsibilities that only touches the affected provinces.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We see many good examples of how Canadians, first nations Canadians, non-indigenous Canadians, Innu Canadians, Inuit Canadians, Métis Canadians and non-status Canadians, many from my own communities, are trying to keep this country together.” About Canadians of many backgrounds keeping the country together, not the motion.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “All of the discussions we are having here are about strengthening and uniting Canada,” General unity talk, not the motion’s subject.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “As I stand here today, I ask Canadians, who is looking after Canada’s interests,” A broad rhetorical question about Canada’s interests, not the motion’s terms.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “and why is it important to me as an indigenous person and to indigenous folks, whether we are from B.C., Saskatchewan or Alberta?” About the speaker’s and indigenous people’s stake generally, not the motion’s proposals.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “I was raised in a household with a father who was a World War II veteran.” About the speaker’s father’s war service, not the motion.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “He was Métis,” Family background, not the motion.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “and his mom was an indigenous woman.” Family background, not the motion.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Every day when my dad came home from his service to Canada during the Second World War, he spoke about the value of Canada as a whole.” About his father’s views of Canada, not the motion.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “As an indigenous person, he was proud to serve his country.” About his father’s pride in service, not the motion.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “Somewhere along the line, Canada’s interests need to be maintained in all of these discussions, through respectful dialogue and discussions among the many provinces that are impacted.” A general call for respectful dialogue among provinces that only touches the motion’s subject.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “At the end of the day, there are many indigenous people across this country who are trying to strengthen our country in all kinds of ways.” About indigenous people strengthening the country generally, not the motion.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Many times I talk to the people in my riding about social and economic justice for the indigenous people,” About social and economic justice in the riding, not the motion.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “and we will achieve that as long as we have respectful dialogue between all parties engaged.” About respectful dialogue generally, not the motion’s terms.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Now, I will go back to my father’s service to this country.” Returns to family military history, not the motion.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “It is a beautiful country.” A general remark about the country, not the motion.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We had a number of family members serve in the military.” Family military service, not the motion.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “They include my older brother who served as a warrant officer in the air force and my younger brother who served as a warrant officer in the army.” Family military service, not the motion.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “I had a sister who also served in the air force,” Family military service, not the motion.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “and my daughter almost joined the navy until her mother talked her out of it.” Family anecdote, not the motion.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “The fact of the matter is that we come from a proud military history within my family.” Family military history, not the motion.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “How did we get that service-to-Canada perspective?” Family history, not the motion.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “It came from our father, who was a World War II veteran who spoke about the value of keeping Canada together.” About his father’s outlook, not the motion.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “He was one solid, strong patriot,” About his father, not the motion.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “and yet he was indigenous.” About his father, not the motion.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “If he saw the discussion here today,” A hypothetical about his father’s reaction, not the motion’s terms.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Let us make Canada stronger, let us make Canada fairer,” A general closing slogan, not the motion’s terms.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “and let us make Canada more independent.” A general closing slogan, not the motion’s terms.
Respect · 100
0 of 88 deductions are Respect
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Nothing lost points.
Clarity · 96
2 of 88 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Vague promise A promise with no date, no measure and no one responsible. What the tags mean → “we will achieve that” A commitment to achieving social and economic justice with no measure, date or success condition named.
Vague promise A promise with no date, no measure and no one responsible. What the tags mean → “we will respect private property ownership” A commitment with no action, measure or date attached to show how the respect will be secured.
Echo · 2 repeated lines
Words members of Parliament keep repeating, found by the same rule for every member. No score depends on it.
“We have always defended private property rights; we always will, and we will always defend the rights of indigenous peoples to build a Canada that is stronger, fairer and more independent.” Said 3 times by 3 members. Every time it was said →
“We immediately appealed the Cowichan decision.” Said 3 times by 3 members. Every time it was said →
Claims · 6
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “on May 5 the Prime Minister said, “The government will always defend private property rights.” On May 5, 2026, the Prime Minister of Canada said ‘The government will always defend private property rights.’ search
2 “We immediately appealed the Cowichan decision.” In his May 5, 2026 remarks, the Prime Minister said the government immediately appealed the Cowichan decision. search
3 “the member for Edmonton Northwest said we need to strengthen the treaties” The member for Edmonton Northwest said in the House that Canada needs to strengthen the treaties. search
4 “a father who was a World War II veteran” The speaker’s father was a World War II veteran. search
5 “my older brother who served as a warrant officer in the air force and my younger brother who served as a warrant officer in the army” The speaker’s older brother served as a warrant officer in the air force and his younger brother served as a warrant officer in the army. search
6 “I had a sister who also served in the air force” The speaker’s sister served in the air force. search