“Mr. Speaker, I am wondering if the member can speak to the risk of directing litigation through the House of Commons and the risk of blurring the line between judicial and parliamentary.”
Statement grade
C+
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity is 84. The grade is held to 68, 30 above Signal.
68 / 100, held down by Signal
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 34%Positioning 58%Reasoning 9%
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Claims · 42 wordsthe rule of law and respect for judicial independence are so critically important in Canada.If we take a look at the motion, it is suggesting that we have a standing committee do what our courts are in the process of doing.Positioning · 72 wordsIt is somewhat bizarre, if we really want to stop to think about it.Maybe what might have been more appropriate is if the official opposition were to consider raising the issue as a possible agenda item, and maybe changed the topic somewhat, maybe broadened it.I think the Conservatives should have gotten better advice before even introducing the motion.As I say, it causes more damage, and it is more divisive.PositioningReasoning · 11 wordsIt is a motion that should not be supported, quite frankly.
