Analysis · Debate reply · beta

Kevin Lamoureux

62 words · 2 sentences · 2 clauses

Replying to Leah Gazan (NDP)
“Mr. Speaker, the member talks about how committed the government is to reconciliation while Amnesty International is being quoted as saying, “when it relates to Indigenous rights...we are stepping back”. The member talks about how great the Liberals are at consulting. Bill C-5, which was passed in record time, violates the constitutionally enshrined rights of indigenous people, yet for Bill S-2, which will take out discrimination against indigenous women and first nation women in Canadian law, their excuse is that they need to consult more, in spite of the fact that this has been going on for years. I wonder if my hon. colleague can be a bit more truthful about their record. Certainly, researchers and legal experts are noticing their failures.”
Statement grade
–
Not graded
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Positioning 15%Claims 85%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Positioning · 9 wordsI would like to think I am always truthful.Positioning Claims · 53 wordsI can tell the member that, any time I have had any form of discussion or been part of a discussion with the Prime Minister about anything dealing with economic development, he is one of the individuals who constantly raises the issue of indigenous peoples’ concerns and making sure that we advance the—

Analysed on