“Mr. Speaker, I would like to congratulate my colleague on his meticulousness and excellent work, as well as on his insightful analysis of the work of the parliamentary secretary across the way. I would like to hear my colleague’s comments. I hear him talking about the amendment that was intended to give victims a choice. We hear a lot of talk in Parliament about the need to consider victims and ensure they receive support and care. We had voted to uphold a request from victims, namely to have a choice, and the government unilaterally removed that provision after securing a majority, through backroom deals to boot. I would like my colleague to respond to that. Does he not think there is a danger or a shift on the part of the Liberal Party, which believes it has a monopoly on the truth?”
Statement grade
A+
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity.
Average 100 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 81%Reasoning 19%
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Claims · 50 wordsthe Bloc Québécois, the Conservative Party and the NDP worked very closely together to bring about the amendments that we wanted at committee.1Even Liberal members of the national defence committee wanted to see changes brought in.2The importance of choice is something that we heard over and over again.Reasoning · 21 wordsIt was the only way we could ensure that the victims would be getting the justice that they so rightly deserve.Claims · 39 wordsWith the changes that have already occurred within the Canadian Armed Forces, there are more and more opportunities for victims to get the help they need and carry through with the prosecution that gives them the justice they deserve.
