Analysis · Question Period answer · beta

Rebecca Alty

69 words · 5 sentences · 5 clauses

Replying to Mel Arnold (Conservative)
“Mr. Speaker, because the Liberal government directed its lawyers to not argue property rights in the Cowichan case, British Columbians who bought their homes, paid their mortgages and followed the law now do not know the status of their home ownership. The Liberal government directive number 14 is still in place. This means that the legal instruction for federal lawyers to not defend property rights remains in place today. British Columbians need certainty of their home ownership. Will the Prime Minister reverse directive 14 today?”
Statement grade
B+
Average 84 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 100%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Claims · 69 wordsthe one thing that is clear is the Conservatives have not read the Musqueam agreement, the full litigation principle number 14 or the Canadian Constitution.Unearned certainty Section 92 shows that provincial authority is private property and private property is provincial authority.1 The member opposite yesterday was talking about the “secret” agreement of Musqueam.2 Again, it is available on the website.3 There are sections 5.1 and 5.2 that he should read.4Partly on point

Analysed on